﻿102 
  F. 
  W. 
  EDWARDS. 
  

  

  Page 
  283. 
  Dr. 
  Langeron, 
  in 
  the 
  paper 
  just 
  cited, 
  records 
  larvae 
  of 
  Uranotaenia 
  

   unguiculata 
  from 
  Southern 
  Tunis. 
  

  

  Page 
  287. 
  A 
  brief 
  description 
  of 
  the 
  larva 
  of 
  Theobaldia 
  alaskaeiisis 
  has 
  been 
  

   given 
  by 
  Dyar 
  (Insec. 
  Inscit. 
  vii, 
  p. 
  33, 
  1919). 
  It 
  differs 
  from 
  T. 
  annulata 
  in 
  the 
  

   siphonal 
  index 
  (2 
  ■ 
  5 
  instead 
  of 
  3-3 
  ■ 
  5). 
  

  

  Page 
  303. 
  I 
  am 
  indebted 
  to 
  Lt.-Col. 
  W. 
  P. 
  MacArthur 
  for 
  two 
  larvae 
  and 
  a 
  perfect 
  

   female 
  of 
  A. 
  zammitti. 
  The 
  larvae 
  are 
  obviously 
  distinct 
  from 
  those 
  of 
  A. 
  mariae, 
  

   from 
  which 
  they 
  differ 
  in 
  the 
  points 
  I 
  have 
  emphasised. 
  The 
  white 
  stripes 
  on 
  the 
  

   thorax 
  of 
  the 
  female 
  are 
  very 
  distinct, 
  and 
  are 
  connected 
  by 
  small 
  white 
  areas 
  with 
  

   the 
  lateral 
  margins. 
  The 
  abdomen 
  has 
  very 
  distinct 
  traces 
  of 
  a 
  median 
  longitudinal 
  

   dorsal 
  stripe, 
  thus 
  approaching 
  rather 
  closely 
  to 
  A. 
  caspius 
  in 
  appearance, 
  though 
  

   differing 
  in 
  the 
  pure 
  white 
  basal 
  segmental 
  bands. 
  

  

  Page 
  304. 
  The 
  Parisian 
  specimens 
  of 
  A. 
  pulchritarsis 
  have 
  been 
  described 
  by 
  

   Seguy 
  as 
  A. 
  berlandi 
  (Bull. 
  Soc. 
  Ent. 
  France, 
  1921, 
  p. 
  192). 
  I 
  consider 
  the 
  form 
  to 
  

   be 
  at 
  most 
  a 
  variety 
  of 
  A. 
  pulchritarsis. 
  

  

  Page 
  310. 
  Dr. 
  H. 
  G. 
  Dyar, 
  who 
  has 
  compared 
  numerous 
  specimens 
  of 
  adults 
  

   and 
  larvae, 
  is 
  of 
  opinion 
  that 
  A. 
  rostochiensis 
  is 
  specifically 
  distinct 
  from 
  A. 
  

   cataphylla. 
  

  

  Page 
  314. 
  The 
  absence 
  of 
  a 
  spine 
  on 
  the 
  basal 
  lobe 
  of 
  the 
  male 
  side-piece 
  will 
  

   not 
  distinguish 
  A. 
  parvulus 
  from 
  A. 
  alpinus. 
  It 
  is 
  really 
  absent 
  or 
  extremely 
  

   weak 
  in 
  A. 
  alpinus 
  also. 
  

  

  Page 
  319. 
  The 
  name 
  Culex 
  wahlgreni, 
  Theobald, 
  should 
  be 
  added 
  to 
  the 
  synonyms 
  

   of 
  Aides 
  geniculates. 
  It 
  was 
  proposed 
  (Mon. 
  Cul. 
  v, 
  p. 
  396, 
  1910) 
  as 
  a 
  substitute 
  

   for 
  C. 
  fusculus, 
  Wahlgren 
  (Ark. 
  Zool., 
  1905). 
  Wahlgren, 
  however, 
  did 
  not 
  introduce 
  

   the 
  name 
  fusculus 
  but 
  merely 
  remarked 
  on 
  Zetterstedt's 
  types. 
  

  

  Page 
  325. 
  According 
  to 
  Mr. 
  Yamada 
  it 
  is 
  doubtful 
  if 
  A 
  . 
  argenteus 
  occurs 
  in 
  Japan 
  

   proper. 
  There 
  may 
  have 
  been 
  some 
  mistake 
  in 
  Theobald's 
  record 
  ; 
  the 
  specimen 
  on 
  

   which 
  it 
  was 
  founded 
  is 
  not 
  now 
  in 
  the 
  British 
  Museum. 
  

  

  Page 
  330. 
  Under 
  heading 
  16 
  in 
  the 
  key 
  the 
  names 
  of 
  the 
  species 
  were 
  accidentally 
  

   reversed. 
  C. 
  vishnui 
  is 
  the 
  species 
  with 
  the 
  long 
  tooth 
  on 
  the 
  mesosome. 
  

  

  Page 
  336. 
  The 
  name 
  of 
  Yamada's 
  species 
  is 
  incorrectly 
  spelt. 
  It 
  should 
  be 
  C. 
  

   hayashii. 
  The 
  correction 
  should 
  be 
  made 
  also 
  in 
  other 
  places 
  where 
  the 
  name 
  is 
  

   used. 
  

  

  Page 
  342. 
  I 
  feel 
  almost 
  certain 
  that 
  Ingram 
  and 
  Macfie 
  have 
  figured 
  an 
  immature 
  

   larva 
  of 
  C. 
  quasigelidus 
  by 
  mistake 
  for 
  the 
  larva 
  of 
  C. 
  univittatus, 
  and 
  full) 
  7 
  anticipate 
  

   that 
  breeding 
  experiments 
  will 
  eventually 
  prove 
  the 
  identity 
  of 
  C. 
  perexiguus 
  and 
  

   C. 
  univittatus. 
  

  

  