8t 



material from crystalline schists while smaller amounts of 

 iiarnet, or none at all, indicate an origin from eruptives or 

 î^ediments. If we look at the table, rather conspicuous differ- 

 ences between the individual samples will be noticed. The first 

 seven contain, on the whole, small amounts, such as an average 

 of 1 per Ct., while the next eight (Nos. 9 — 17) contain on an 

 average 3V2 per Ct. This must correspond with some differ- 

 ence in the nature of the rocks of the country inland. On 

 examining the chart it will be seen that deposits Nos. 9 — 17 can 

 get material from С lavering- and its neighbourhood, whereas 

 the deposits above mentioned cannot, there will therefore be 

 found in this part some rocks rich in garnet. If we proceed 

 we shall see that samples No. 18 to 31, contain very small amounts 

 of garnet, only 1 per Ct. on au average. With regard to the 

 first of these, this circumstance is connected with the large 

 amount of sediments that enter into it; in the deposits along 

 the northern part of the Liverpool Kyst on the other hand, 

 the small amount of garnet must have originated in some 

 special way with the archæan territory on land. 



Along the southern part of the Liverpool Kyst, a larger 

 amount of garnet suddenly appears (2—5 per Ct.), and there- 

 fore some crystalline schists must occur here. As might be 

 expected, absolutely no garnet is found in the deposits south 

 of К ар lî г e w s te г. 



The amount of opaque grains is obviously connected Avith 

 the amount of basalt in the samples; only in the samples from 

 along the Liverpool Kyst is a comparatively larger amount 

 found, a tact which is probably due to special conditions in 

 the rocks of the counlrv. 



