488 CEETACEOUS PELECYPODA 



A new species of a Sippurite is also described by Pirona, vol. xi, fasc. iii^ of 

 the Atti della soc. ital. di sc. nat. I have not seen the publication itself. 



Family^ — L ucinidm. 

 On page 252 add- — 



Via. Umcardium tumidum, Briar t et Cornet, (Eoss. de Bracquegnies, 1868, 

 p. 68, pi. vii, figs. 6-7, in Mem. Conr. Acad., Belg., yol. xxxiy). 



Family, — Ujs g ulinidm. 



On page 261, at the end, add — 



8. Tenea, Conrad, 1870, (Am. Journ. Conch., VI, p. 72), Shell roundly 

 ovate, thin, tumid; left valve under the apex with a A -shaped tooth, the anterior 

 lobe of which is continued along the anterior margin of the shell, separated by a 

 deep groove from it ; in the right valve are two cardinal teeth united above, the 

 anterior is falcate, with a pit on each side, the posterior curved and directed 

 obliquely backwards ; type, T, parilis (Mysia parilisj, Conrad, noticed under the 

 latter name on p. 262, under No. 4. 



Family, — Astartibje, 

 On page 287 add — 



127<^. Astarte ? staminea, Conrad, (Am. Journ. Conch., VI, p. 73,) from 

 E/ipley county, Mississippi. 



143(^. Cardita corrugata, Ess., (tenuicosta apud Reuss, Boehmische Kreidef., 

 p. 4). Giimbel (Abhandl. Akad., Miinchen, x, p. 568,) considers the Bohemian 

 species as distinct from- the English, and retains for it the name originally 

 given to it by Beuss. 



159<^. Cardita KonincU, Briart et Cornet, (Eoss. de Bracquegnies, 1868, 

 p. 70, pi. vii, figs. 8-9, in Mem. Cour. Acad., Belg., vol. xxxiv). 



1595. Cardita spinosa, B. and C. {ibidem^, 71, pi. vii, figs. 12, 13, and 16). 



Family, — Crassatbllidm, 

 On page 294, last line in the foot note, for No. 109, read 112. 

 On page 295— No. 65, Crassatella Eatisbonensis, Giimbel, (Corresp.-Blatt d 



Zool. Min. Vereins zu Eegensburg, xxii, 1868, p. 66, pi. 1, fig. 4,) is based upon 



imperfect casts from the cretaceous beds near Eegensburg. 



Family, — Nuculidje, 



Page 327, No. 66. Giimbel (in Neues Jahrbuch f. Mineralog. for 1865 

 p. 148,) says that the original of N, maxima does not admit even'^of a generic 

 determination. The name, as likewise that which follows, should be altogether 

 omitted. 



