PEESEXT COXDITIOX OF THE FISHERIES. 31 



Mr. Eecord : 



Mr.^Swaii'S fatlier'tokl me that at the beginning of tlie present cen- 

 tury sciip "svere a new lisli. 



Extract from correspondence with parties near Xeicport. 



"^S^EWPOET, E. I., August 4, 1871. 

 " About the 10th of October, in the year 1869, Captain Joseph Sher- 

 man and William B. Gough in three hours' fishing caught 250 pounds of 

 tautog and 10 pounds of cod and sea-bass. Another boat occupied 

 tlie same ground the same day, and caught 250 pounds tautog — two 

 men fishing. 



"WM. B. GOUGH.*' 



"Xewpoet, August, 1871. 



" Deae Sie : Tliinking you might wish to verify, or inquire more into 

 the matter while he^e, I send you the statement of Captain Garritt, of 

 Westerly, Ehode Maud. He has known bass caught in June that 

 weighed from half to one pound, that were first put into a pond, and, when 

 taken out in October following, Aveighed six pounds. A boy living with 

 him caught, at the mouth of a small brook, two miles above the fishing- 

 ground on Pawcatuck Eiver, a female tautog weighing about 5 pounds. 

 It was very full of far-developed spawn. He thinks the spawn would 

 weigh a pound. The water where taken was not over one foot deep. 

 He also states that the light-house keeper, (not the present,) Mr. Pendle- 

 ton, lost a bob fishing for bass at TVatch Hill, that was taken next day 

 with the fish in Long Island Sound. It was identified and returned to 

 him. 



^' Yours, with respect. 



^'J. M. K. SOUTHWICK. 



" Professor Bated." 



" TiYEETOX, August 11, 1871. 



'' Deae Sie : I have been informed that you are collecting information 

 about fish for the purpose of guiding Congress, if they see fit, to take up 

 the question. If so, 1 should like to submit some facts to you about 

 their increase, decrease, &c., that have come under my observation. 



" This question is important, for it afiects a large number of i)eople, 

 and there are large sums of money invested, and hasty legislation upon 

 one sided facts might ruin men, and all trouble might be averted ])to- 

 vided the proper facts were presented. 



'• My opinion is that man is not an enemy of a salt-water fish. I mean 

 by that statement that all machinery yet devised by man for taking fish 

 does not perceptibly affect the supply, although there are many facts 

 about fish, looked at superficially, that would tend to lead a man to a 

 difi'erent conclusion. Por instance, scup have disappeared from l!^arra- 

 gansett Bay. Some say seines have been the cause, or traps. But 

 squeteague have taken their place, and where, ten years ago, there were 

 millions of scup, now there are almost none, but millions of squeteague. 

 How does that square ? If the traps destroy one, why not the other, for 

 they both come the same course and both are caught in traps. But the 

 most significant fact in relation to the squeteague question is, they don't 

 come few at a time and gradually increase from year to year, but sud- 

 denly appear. Hundreds of acres could be seen any clear day between 



