108 PETEOLOGT OF THE YICINITY OF LOCH MAEEE. 



Mr. EuTLET had seen structure like that in the metamorphic 

 rock described by Prof. Bonney in artificially altered sandstones. 



Mr. Blae:e argued on general grounds against the correctness of 

 the section given by Dr. Hicks. 



Prof. Seelet had not examined the country with a view to 

 deciding between the contending views. He insisted on the great 

 variability of the rocks. 



Prof. BoiyTNET insisted that the map which Dr. Hicks relied upon 

 was very inaccurate. Prof. Morris quite agreed with him as to 

 the evidence derived from the microscopic sections. He insisted on 

 the necessity of greater accuracy than Dr. Hicks had shown in fixing 

 the locality of his specimens. He was quite content to await the 

 judgment of future observers as to the accuracy of the views which 

 he was maintaining. 



