156 H. G. Keene—JVotes on a Map of the Mughal Umpire. [July, 



2.— Bahae, Rs. 1,21,50,000 



3.— Orissa (called by Manucci "Urcha"), 57,07,500 



4. — OuDH (called " Rajmahal" apparently), 1,00,50,000 



5.— DiHLi, 1,25,50,000 



G.— Agea, 2,22,03,550 



7.— Allahabad, 77,38,000 



8.— Lahoe, 2,32,05,000 



9.— Kabul, 32,07,250 



10. — Ajmie (Rajputana, temporarily subjugated 



and heavily assessed), 19,00,000 



11.— MuLTA^, 50,25,000 



12.— Malwa, 99,06,250 



13. — Gujaea't (probably including Customs), 2,32^95,000 



14.— Kha'ndes, 1,11,05,000 



IS.—Beea'e, 1,58,07,500 



16. — GojsrDWA'jfA (no assessment given in any list 



but of Aurangzib's reign). 

 17. — AiJEUNGABAD, or a part thereof, (called " Bag- 

 lana" from Baghelana a hilly tract in the 

 heart of the Mahratta country. Tallies 

 with estimates of Tavernier and Bernier,... 68,85,000 



All Aurangabad or Daulatabad rated much 

 higher in native lists. 



18.— Bija'pue, ... 5,00,00,000 



19. — Haidaeabad (not named by Manucci, proba- 

 bly included in " Golconda," 5,00,00,000 



20. — BiBAi {i. e. " Nanda" aggregate in other 

 lists running from 93 lakhs to over two 

 'krors), 72,00,000 



Total, 31,79,35,050 



It will be seen that there are discrepancies, both as to names and 

 rating, between Manucci's list and those derived from native sources. 

 But such, just a century after the completion of Abul Fazl's record, were 

 the collections according to a European residing at the Imperial Court in 

 a position of trust. Mr. Thomas calls Manucci " a competent witness at 

 head-quarters." He does not name the Subahs always as they are named 

 in other lists that have come down to us ; and he gives some names (such 

 as " Bakar" and " Ujain" that are not found elsewhere. And he estimates 

 the returns of some higher and those of other lower than they are usually 

 reckoned. But it must be admitted that his aggregate tallies pretty closely 



