A. Hogg — Reports on Coins. [Jan., 



No. of specimens. 



1, III. JaUl-ed-din Akbar, A. H. 963—1014 = A. D. 



1556 — 1605. Circular area. Obv . name of Em- 

 peror and mint. Rev. Legend, mint Ahmedabad, 

 year of reign 14 3 



2, IY. Jelidngir,A. H. 1014—1037 = A.D. 1605—1627. 



Circular area. Obv. name of Emperor and 

 mint. Rev. Legend and date : mints Patna, 

 Lahor and Ahmedabad, dates 1014-1024-1026... 8 



3, V. Shah JeMn, A. H. 1037—1068 = A. D. 1627— 



1658. They are of 3 types, viz. : — 

 a. Marsden's No. DCCCLXX, p. 642, mints 

 Lahor, Agra, years of reign 8-9-17- 



18-21-24-26-29 35 



I. Marsden's No. DCCCLXIV, p. 637, mints 

 Surat, Patna, Ahmedabad, Seeun- 

 drabad, Agra, years of reign 4-15 ... 11 

 c. Marsden's No. DCCCLXVII, p. 639, mint 



Surat, years of reign 2-4 2 



4, VI. Aurangzib, A. H. 1068—1118 = A. D. 1658— 



1707. 



Marsden's No. DCCCXC, p. 652, mints Surat, 



Golkonda ...,, , , 8 



Total... 67 



Dr. RaJENDRALala Mitra, in laying before the meeting a letter from 

 Professor Max Miiller on the derivation of the Buddhist term EJcotibhdva, 

 made the following remarks : — 



In April last Dr. Max Miiller published in the ' Academy ' a note 

 on the etymology of the Buddhist term EJcotibhdva, which he took 

 to be "an irregular contraction" of Eka-kotibhdva, and I had occasion to 

 dissent from this in a note which appeared in our * Proceedings ' for 

 June last. Anent this note I have now received from the learned 

 gentleman a letter, the following extract from which will, I think, in- 

 terest our members : 



" Oxford, 26th October, 1886. 

 "My dear Sir, 



" I read with much interest your remarks on my paper on Ekoti- 

 bhdva. Of course, I fully agree with all you say about EJcotibhdva, 

 with dental t. That can be derived from eka and uti. But I had 



