278 



INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL ANTHKOPOLOGY — PUBLICATION NO. 13 

 Table 20. — The dated wars of Moctezuma II (1502-20)" — Continued 



Key 



No., 



map 



18 



Pueblo 



Codice Cbimal- 

 popoca 



Anales de 

 Tlatelolco 



nistoria de los 

 mexicanos por 

 sus pinturas 



Codex Telleriano- 

 Remensis 



Torquemada 



Codice en Cruz 



Iitlibtochitl 



45 













[1517]- 

 (1: 228) [1519] 



11 acatl 1503 

 (pp. 84-85, 147) 





47 













1516 



49 













[1506] 

 (1: 210) 



[1508] 

 (1:211) 



(2:333) 



52 

















55 



Amatlan " 





4 calli [1509] 

 (p. 61) 



7 tecpatl [1512] 

 (P. 61) 











63 



"Tozac" 30 - 















64 













3 tecpatl 1508 

 (pp. 104, 147) 





73 



Mitla 











[1508] 

 (1:211) 



[1506] 



(1: 207) 



[1505] 

 (1:203- [1506] 

 204, 208) 

 1 [1506] 

 kl: 207) 



[1506] 

 (1: 209, [1512] 

 215) 



[1508] 

 (1:211) 



[1509] 

 (1: 211) 



[1510] 

 (1:213) 



[1513] 

 (1: 215) 



[1514] 

 (1:215) 



[1517]- 

 (1: 228) [1519] 





92 











2 cartas 1507 



[acatl] 

 (5: 154) 







94 































95 







96 

















97 

















98 

















99 















1514 



100 















(2: 319) 



101 

















102 



"Cihua"" 















106 















110 











12 tecpatl 1504 

 (p. 85) 













1 







» See the first two paragraphs of footnote a, table 16. Dubious conquest or doubtful pueblo identification is discussed in the notes which accompany map 

 18; numbered notes in the table refer to the comments appended to that map. Braces apply only to the column in which they are placed. 



Mexican sources make scant mention of Totona- 

 capan at this time. " Jicotepec" (map 18, No. 28) , 

 modern Villa Juarez, was conquered. On the 

 main route to Papantla and the Huasteca, it was 

 an ancient conquest of Texcoco (p. 22), and dur- 

 ing the sixteenth century was in part Totonac. 

 Other than this, Mexican sources report the sub- 

 jugation of only three Totonac pueblos : Pan tepee 

 (map 18, No. 70) , on the northern limits of the 

 zone; 6r and Pancoac and Tlayehualancingo (map 

 18, Nos. 38, 39) . 



However, various sixteenth-century relaciones 

 geogrdficas indicate extensive conquests in Toto- 

 nacapan during the reign of the younger Mocte- 

 zuma. Several pueblos — Papantla, 58 Chapultepec 



07 Krickeberg (p. 109) places Pantepec and Caltepec "in a 

 region of Totonac speech." However, he locates Caltepec near 

 Tezlutlan, in modern Puebla. We find a Caltepec In the census 

 reports of Puebla, but far to the south, near Tehuacan. 



58 ". . . tenian estos yndios antiguamente un governador puesto 

 por montecuma que los tenia en paz y que antes que montccuma 

 naselese ni eredase este rreyno no estauan estos yndios subjetos 

 al padre de mo?iteQuma ni a otra persona y que tenian guerra con 

 el y defendfan sus tierras y peleauan con fechas [sic] y arcos 

 . desnudos en cueros, y que despues vinieron donde a muchos anos 

 que ya estauan cansados de defender sus tierras 6 t€rniinos se 

 dieron biamente a montecuma al qual obedecian como dicho 

 es . . ." (Relac!6n de Papantla). 



and Tepetlan (map 18, Nos. 114, 115, 116), the 

 two latter near Jalapa — claimed to have preserved 

 their independence until this time (Paso y 

 Troncoso 5:110, 118). Jalapa, in part Totonac, 

 and Ixhuacan, a nearby Mexicano pueblo (map 18, 

 Nos. 117, 118), both reported having been con- 

 quered for the first time by Moctezuma II (Paso y 

 Troncoso, 5:102, 122). 



Jilotepec and Coacoatzintla (map 18, Nos. 119, 

 121) also indicated pretty clearly that their sub* 

 mission to Mexico dated from this era (Paso y 

 Troncoso 5: 106, 110). For Tlacolulan, the same 

 situation is implied (see footnote 56, map 18). 

 The conquest of Naolinco, Acathin, Miahuatlan, 

 and Colipa (map 18, Nos. 122-125) is attributed to 

 Moctezuma (see footnote 57, map 18), and, de- 

 spite some confusion, the same presumably holds 

 for Jonotla and Ecatlan (map 18, Nos. 127, 128), 

 two Totonac towns farther west, in the Sierra de 

 Puebla (Paso y Troncoso 5:128, 140). 59 



59 In 1581, Jonotla informants estimated that their conquest 

 by Moctezuma had taken place about a hundred years before ; 

 and, at the same time, those of Ecatlan declared that they had 

 been subjugated by the Mexicans 20 years prior to the coming 

 of the Spaniards. Despite these inaccuracies in dating, the 

 reign of the younger Moctezuma presumably is Indicated. 



