THE TAJIN TOTONAC PART 1 KELLY AND PALERM 281 



Legend to map 10 



Early Mexican wars: Acamapichtli (1370-96). In this and the legends to succeeding maps (Nos. 11-18), the data 

 have been handled similarly. A full explanation will be given here, to avoid the necessity of repetition. 



In the legends to maps 10 to 18 and in tables 16 to 20, the sources are cited in the same arbitrary sequence: C6dice 

 Chimalpopoca, Anales de Tlatelolco, Colecci6n de Mendoza, Historia de los mexicanos por sus pinturas, Codex Telleriano- 

 Remensis, Torquemada, Tezozomoc, C6dice en Cruz, and Ixtlilxochitl. Following the latter is appended any supple- 

 mentary material which has been used. Omission of one of the above sources indicates that we found in it no data per- 

 tinent to the reign under consideration. 



Data concerning wars and conquests are presented in four columns. In the first is a key number, ordinarily assigned 

 a pueblo the first time it appears on a given one of our lists. If it is possible to locate the town, the corresponding number 

 is entered on the map. Each map, incidentally has a separate set of numbers; for example, No. 2 of the present map 

 and of succeeding ones applies to quite different settlements. 



When a given pueblo appears in sources cited subsequently in our same list, reference is made merely to key number. 

 Thus, in the present case, the C6dice Chimalpopoca gives Xochimilco as a conquest of Acamapichtli. It is third on the 

 list below and is so numbered. The Anales de Tlatelolco speak of the subjection of the Xochimilca, obviously the people 

 of Xochimilco. Accordingly, the identification is not repeated in the legend, but reference is made to No. 3. 



The second column lists wars and conquests, as they appear in individual sources, with the orthography of the latter 

 retained. The listing is in precisely the same order as in the respective sources, since relative position in a series some- 

 times is a useful clue to identification. 



The third column gives the page reference; to avoid repetition, towns mentioned on the same page are grouped by 

 brackets; the latter apply only to this column. 



In the fourth and last column is given the suggested identification. When a pueblo has been identified with a still 

 existent town, the name is given as it appears in the 1930 Federal census. For extinct pueblos, the old spelling is retained, 

 and the name is in quotation marks. A blank in the fourth column means that we are unable to offer an identification; 

 in such case, a discussion of the problem will be found in the numbered notes at the end of the legend. 



The notes also discuss doubtful conquest. If a pueblo appears on one of our lists, unaccompanied by a note, it may 

 be assumed that the source cited indicates clearly that the pueblo in question was a Mexican conquest. 



For the early Mexican wars (maps 10-12), we have not attempted to prepare chronological tables. The latter start 

 with Itzcoatl (map 13, table 16) and cover each subsequent reign, save that of Tizoc, whose campaigns are largely undated. 

 When wars are reported on both map and table, as in the case of Itzcoatl, the same set of key numbers is used, to facilitate 

 cross reference. 



