286 



INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL ANTHROPOLOGY PUBLICATION NO. 13 



Legend to map 12 

 Early Mexican wars: Chimalpopoca (1417-27). See legend to map 10. 



Key 

 No. 



Source pueblo 



Page 



Pueblo identification 



1 

 2 

 3 



4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 



11 

 12 

 13 



C6dice Chimalpopoca: 



Teopancalco ' 



Atenchicalcan l 



Tecpan ' 



Anales de Tlatelolco: 



Toltitlan 



Quauhtitlan 



Otompan 



Tollantzinco 2 



Acolman 



Chalca J 



Auilizapaneca 4 



Toltitlancalque 6 



Collecci6n de Mendoza: 



Tequixquiac 



Chalco 8 



Historia de los mexicanos por sus pinturas : 



Tezcuco a 



Tulancingo 2 



Torquemada: 



Xaltocan 7 



Tetzcuco 6 



C6dice en Cruz. 8 



Ixtlilxochitl: 



Tetzcuco 6 



37 



16 



54 

 55 



5:43 



229 



1:107 

 1:114 



2:104 



Tultitlan de Mariano Escobedo, Mexico. 

 Cuautitlan de Romero Rubio, Mexico. 

 Otumba, Mexico. 

 Tulancingo, Hidalgo. 

 San Bartolo Acolman, Mexico. 

 Tlalmanalco de Velazquez, Mexico. 

 Orizaba, Veracruz. 

 See 4. 



Tequixquiac, Mexico. 

 See 9. 



Texcoco de Mora, Mexico. 

 See 7. 



Jaltocan, Mexico. 

 See 12. 



See 12. 



1 These three towns were given Chimalpopoca by Tezozomoc, ruler of Azca- 

 potzalco, probably as a reward for Mexican participation in the war with 

 Texcoco (Codice Chimalpopoca, p. 37). Since mention is made of "los 

 cuitlahuacas de Teopancalco, de Atenchicalcan y Tecpan, tres lugares juntos" 

 (pp. 37, 62), we have located the pueblos near modern Tlahuac. Elsewhere 

 (p. 51), the Codice Chimalpopoca tends to confirm such a location for "Aten- 

 chicalcan." 



J See footnote 5, map 11. 



! The Anales de Tlateloco suggest war followed by conquest; the Coleccion 

 de Mendoza explains that "Chalco" was subdued after an uprising. 



* Orizaba is remote from the field of action, yet no other identification seems 

 likely. It is barely possible that Orizaba was involved in the Texcoco-Azca- 

 potzalco war (see footnote 4, map 11), in which the Mexicans participated. 

 Upon occasion, Orizaba and Tlaxcala collaborated as allies (p. 271), at least 

 in theory, and we know that Tlaxcala was friendly with Texcoco (Ixtlilxochitl 

 2: 135; Codice Chimalpopoca, p. 46). 



The Anales de Tlatelolco state merely that the inhabitants of Orizaba 

 perished— a phrase we have taken as connoting conquest, despite want of 

 confirmation by other sources. 



f The Anales de Tlatelolco state that those of Tultitlan perished — an expres- 

 sion we interpret as indicating conquest; elsewhere (p. 16), the same source 

 confirms the conquest. 



• See footnote 4, map 11. 



' Torquemada (1: 107) reports a rebellion in Jaltocan, and suggests that the 

 Mexicans, as vassals of Azcapotzalco, may have participated in its subjuga- 

 tion. However, this campaign under Chimalpopoca is not confirmed in 

 other sources. Possibly, it took place during the previous reign, and the 

 chronological confusion Torquemada displays concerning this period (see 

 footnote 4, map 11), has led him to place it during the era of Chimalpopoca. 



8 Dibble (pp. 23-24) interprets the Codice en Cruz as recording a war 

 between Azcapotzalco and Texcoco (see footnote 4, map 11.) 



