THE TAJIN TOTONAC PART 1 KELLY AND PALERM 



303 



Legend to map 16 — Continued 



' Barlow (1947 c, pp. 187-188) suggests that " Tonallymoquetzayan" may 

 be modern Tonaliquizaya, northwest of Tetela, Guerrero; we do not find a 

 settlement listed under this name in the 1930 census. 



However, in both the Codice Chimalpopoca and the Coleccion de Mendoza, 

 the pueblo appears together with Tecaxic, Toxhi, Ecatepec, and Chila, all in 

 the State of Mexico; we suspect that the ancient town should be sought in 

 this region rather than in Guerrero. 



2 See footnote 9, map 13. 



• "Macatepec" presumably is the equivalent of Mazahua (footnote 11, map 

 10); at least, in the Codice Chimalpopoca it occupies the place which, in the 

 Anales de Tlatelolco, corresponds to Mazahua. 



4 *'Ecatlyquappanco" evidently is the equivalent of "Ecatlapechco" and 

 "Ecatlyguapecha," the latter respectively of the Anales de Tlatelolco and the 

 Coleccion de Mendoza. 



Our identification with Tlapexco is highly dubious. In both the Codice 

 Chimalpopoca and the Anales de Tlatelolco, the pueblo falls between towns 

 in the modern State of Mexico and in modern Veracruz. However, in the 

 Coleccion de Mendoza, the association suggests a location in the Huasteca 

 of Veracruz. 



•"Otlappan" obviously corresponds to "Tlapan," of the Coleccion de 

 Mendoza, hence is identifiable with modern Tlapa, in the State of Guerrero. 



•"Xochiyetlan" might be identified either with modern Yetla, in Oaxaca, 

 or with Yetlan, in Puebla; both possibilities are shown on the map. 



7 Not identified. The association of these two pueblos with Toxhf, Ecate- 

 pec, and Chila suggests a location in the modern State of Mexico, as shown on 

 our map, or possibly an independent group in northern Veracruz (see foot- 

 note 21, map 15). 



'"Matlapachco" corresponds to "Tamapachco" (Codice Chimalpopoca) 

 and "Tamapacha" (Coleccion de Mendoza); we have identified it with 

 Temapache, in modern Veracruz. 



8 Not identified, but obviously to be sought in the northern part of modern 

 Veracruz (see footnote 21, map 15). 



10 Obviously located somewhere in northern Veracruz; the Anales de Tla- 

 telolco speak of "Tlatlauhqui ycxi alia por Tziuhcouac." We have identified 

 the conquest with modern Tlatlacxoquico. 



11 Not identified; the two succeeding pueblos suggest a location somewhere 

 in the modern Oaxaca-Puebla zone, and there we have placed it, with an 

 interrogation point. 



» Not identified. The Anales de Tlatelolco report the suppression of an 

 uprising, thus implying previous conquest; the wording suggests a location not 

 far from Tenochtitlan. 



13 We follow Penafiel (p. 248) in interpreting " Yamanitlam" as Yanhuitlan. 



14 Not identified; possibly the"Macatlan" (Suma, No. 657) in the vicinity 

 of Yanhuitlan and Tehuacan. 



16 The Historia de los mexicanos por sus pinturas states that victims of 

 'Matalcingos" and victims of "Tlaula" were sacrificed in Tenochtitlan. 



Conquests in the Matlatzinca zone (Nos. 1, 21?], 3, 5, 8[?], 15[?], 16[?], 21, 24, 

 25) are reported in the Codice Chimalpopoca, the Anales de Tlatelolco, the 

 Coleccion de Mendoza, and Torquemada. The conquest of "Tlaula," how- 

 ever, is not confirmed by other sources; its identification is discussed in foot 

 note 11, map 15. 



18 The Codex Telleriano-Remensis reports that the Mexicans went to Zina- 

 cantepec to obtain sacrificial victims. Conquests in this same general 

 Matlatzinca zone, during the reign of Tizoe, are confirmed by other sources 

 (see footnote 15, above). 



17 This campaign likewise was designed to obtain victims for sacrifice. In 

 this instance, Tezozomoc uses "Cuextlan" to designate the Huasteca who 

 helped defend Metztitlan against Mexican aggression. 



