316 



INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL ANTHROPOLOGY — PUBLICATION NO. 13 



Legend to map 18 — Continued 



• The Codiee Chimalpopoca reports that "Teuctepee" and "Itztitlan" 

 were depopulated through "pestilence," which we interpret as war (cf. 

 footnote 4, map 17). Conquest of both pueblos is confirmed elsewhere in the 

 same source (p. 67), as well as by other data: 



"Teuctepee": Anales de Tlatelolco, Coleccion de Mendoza, Torquemada, 

 Tezozomoc. 



"Itztitlan": Anales de Tlatelolco, Coleccion de Mendoza, Torquemada. 



2 Although "Teotepec" apparently does not appear under this name in 

 the 1930 census, it is shown in the Atlas geografico. The latter places it on 

 the coast of Oaxaca, a location which would accord with Tezozomoc. Never- 

 theless, the Codiee Chimalpopoca, the Anales de Tlatelolco, and the Colec- 

 cion de Mendoza give the impression that the pueblo was situated in north- 

 central Oaxaca, near Sosola. Both possibilities, queried, appear on our map. 



3 These pueblos evidently were involved in war, although there is no re- 

 port of conquest, except for Huejotzingo (Anales de Tlatelolco). 



The Codiee Chimalpopoca attributes the campaigns in question to Cuau- 

 titlan, despite the fact that the latter apparently was conquered by the 

 Mexicans in the days of Acamapichtli (map 10, No. 11). 



Torquemada mentions war with Atlixco and Huejotzingo, as does Tezo- 

 zomoc, who includes Cholula for good measure; Ixtilxochitl speaks of war 

 with Atlixco. But all these sources refer to the Triple Alliance. Accordingly, 

 the pueblos are listed here, despite the fact that the Codiee Chimalpopoca 

 attributes the campaigns to Cuautitlan. 



4 Identification doubtful; it is suggested simply because Tenango falls 

 within the zone affected by this campaign. 



' The Codiee Chimalpopoca does not attribute these campaigns definitively 

 to Mexico, but there are confirmatory data. Except for "Iztactlallocan," 

 Quimixtlan, and Ocotlan, corroboration is found elsewhere in the same source 

 (pp. 67-68). For the two last-mentioned pueblos, there are no further data, 

 but the others appear as conquests in various sources: 



Ixpantepec: Anales de Tlatelolco, Coleccion do Mendoza, Codex Telleria- 

 no-Remensis, Torquemada, Tezozomoc, Codiee en Cruz, Ixtlilxochitl. 



Suchiltepec: Torquemada, Ixtlilxochitl. 



Tlaxiaco: Anales de Tlatelolco, Coleccion de Mendoza, Torquemada, 

 Tezozomoc, Ixtilxochitl. 



"Iztactlallocan": Coleccion de Mendoza, Codex Telleriano-Remensis, 

 Torquemada, Ixtlilxochitl. 



Zenzontepee: Anales de Tlatelolco, Coleccion de Mendoza, Torquemada. 



' See footnote 8, map 17. 



•a Not identified and not shown on map; probably the same as "Tezon 

 quauhtla" (Anales de Tlatelolco). in which case the pueblo should be located 

 in modern Oaxaca (see footnote 23, below). 



' Not identified; presumably in modern Oaxaca, at no great distance from 

 the modern pueblos of Tututepec and Sola de Vega. Queried on map. 



8 Identification doubtful; based in part on associated pueblos and in part 

 on the fact that "Chichihualtatacallan," or " ehichihual-te-ta-calla" means 

 "lugar de nodrizas" (Penafiel, p. 107), as does modern Chichihualtepec (Leduc 

 ct al, p. 253). 



6 We suspect that "Ollan" is Molango, since the two pueblos occupy com- 

 parable positions in the lists respectively of the Codiee Chimalpopoca and 

 the Anales de Tlatelolco. 



10 "Itzyoyocan" (Codiee Chimalpopoca) appears to correspond to "Yzte- 

 yocan" (Coleccion de Mendoza); we have identified both with modern 

 Teyuca. 



'i Identification doubtful; we suggest Tlayehualancingo, near Pancoac, 

 with which latter the pueblo appears associated in the Codiee Chimalpopoca. 

 However, it likewise is associated with Caltepec (Anales de Tlatelolco) and 

 with Pantepec and Zautla (Coleccion de Mendoza). 



12 In this instance, there are two possibilities, both pueblos known as Chi- 

 pa, in modern Puebla. Both appear on the map with an interrogation 

 point. 



,2 » Identified, somewhat dubiously. Torquemada places the pueblo near 

 "Cihuapohualoyan," which is securely located, thanks to a sixteenth-century 

 map (footnote 43). However. Tezozomoc couples Quetzaltepec with Tii- 

 tutepee. which suggests coastal Oaxaca. 



1 3 Identification dubious; possibly, San Andres, San Pedro, or Santiago 

 Ixtlahuaca, the firsl two in eastern Oaxaca, the third in the western part of 

 the State. Both possibilities are shown on our map. 



However, it is by no means impossible that the pueblo in question should 

 be located near Quetzaltepec, as Torquemada implies, when he remarks that 

 those of "Cuezcomaixtlahuacan" fled from the Mexicans and took refuge in 

 Quetzaltepec. 



h Two possibilities, both in Oaxaca and both pueblos called Zaoateuec, are 

 shown on map IS. 



15 We equate "Xallapan" with "Xalpan," since the two pueblos occupy 

 corresponding positions respectively in the lists of the Codiee Chimalpopoca 

 and the Anales de Tlatelolco. Both have been identified with modern 

 Jalpam, in Oaxaca. 



10 Not identified; the associated pueblos suggest a location in modern 

 1 1 i aca. Queried on our map. 



" Two possibilities, both in Puebla, and both pueblos called Tlatlauqui- 

 u pec, an- shown on the map. 



• The name obviously incomplete. 



'•Wo assume that " Tlalotfipec" (Anales de Tlatelolco) is the same as 

 Tlacotepec (Ixtlilxochitl); botli have been identified with modern Tlaeotepec. 



20 It is evident that "Tziuactlan" and possibly "Ciuatlan." (Anales de 

 Tlatel co) correspond to "Tzinaeatlan" (Codiee Chimalpopoi i) and "Qia- 

 acantlan" oleccion de Mendoza); all have been identified with modern 

 Zinacantan in Chia * 



2 ' Not identified, although approximate location is shown on the map, on 

 the basis of dat in the Sunn (No. 725). 



^"Mictlan" and "Micquetlan" evidently are equivalent; they occupy 



corresponding positions respectively in the lists of the Anal 'S de Tl-ileloleo 

 and I he Codiee Chimalpopoca; both have been identified with modern 

 Mequetla, in Veracruz. 



" \'ot identified; probably the same as "Texoquauhtli" (No. 12a) of the 

 Codiee Chimalpopoca (see I totnote 6a, above). The association with Nopala 

 (Anales de Tlatelolco) suggests a location in modern Oaxaca. Queried on 

 our map. 



24 Possibly Nos. 57 and 58 represent variant spellings of the same name 

 the latter, at least, may be identified with modern Tecpatla. in Veracruz- 



25 Not identified; unfortunately, at this point the lists of the Codiee Chimal- 

 popoca and the Anales de Tlatelolco do not run parallel, hence equivalents 

 cannot be suggested. Nevertheless, association with Caltepec, suggests 

 possible reference to the pueblo dubiously identified as Tlayehualancingo 

 (No. 39). 



29 Two possibilities are suggested, one in Oaxaca and one in Guerrero; 

 both are shown on map 18. 



27 Obviously "Cuezcomayxtlahuacan" (No. 44), with the name divided. 



28 Not identified; the associated pueblos suggest a possible location in 

 modern Oaxaca. Queried on our map. 



21 The Anales de Tlatelolco use the expression, "perished," which we as- 

 sume to indicate conquest. In any event, there are corroborative data: 



Achiutla: Codiee Chimalpopoca, Coleccion de Mendoza, Torquemada. 



Sosola: elsewhere in the Anales de Tlatelolco (p. 17), Codiee Chimalpopoca, 

 Coleccion de Mendoza. Historia de los mexicanos por sus pinturas, Codex 

 Telleriano-Remensis, Torquemada, Tezozomoc, Ixtlilxochitl. 



"Teotepec:" see footnotes 1, 2, above. 



Amatlan: elsewhere in the Anales de Tlatelolco (p. 18). 



Ixpantepec: see footnote 5. above. 



Ixtlahuaca: elsewhere in the Anales de Tlatelolco (p. 18) (see footnote 27, 

 above), Codiee Chimalpopoca, Coleccion de Mendoza, Torquemada. For 

 identification see footnote 13, above. 



"Iztactlallocan:" see footnote 5, above, and footnote 8, map 17. 



30 Not identified; queried on our map. The context (Anales de Tlatelolco) 

 suggests a location in modern Oaxaca, not far from Sola. There is no de- 

 finitive mention of conquest, but of rebellion and flight of population; the 

 conquest is not confirmed in other sources. 



31 In the Coleccion de Mendoza, Tecaxic appears isolated. Probably it 

 can be placed safely in the State of Mexico, on the basis of associated pueblos 

 in the campaigns of Tizoc (map 16, No. 1). 



32 Two possibilities, both pueblos called Hueyapan, one in Puebla and one 

 in Veracruz, are shown on the map. We incline toward the former, since the 

 town appears on the list with "Pipiyoltepec" (No. 67), in Veracruz, close to 

 the Puebla border. 



33 Not identified; association with Caltepec, Pantepec, and Zautla, suggests 

 possible reference to dubiously identified Tlayehualancingo (No. 39) of the 

 Codiee Chimalpopoca. See footnotes 11 and 2.5, above. 



34 Not located; apparently to be sought in the modern State of Mexico, or 

 along the Mexico-Puehla frontier. Queried on our map. 



33 See footnote 53, below, and footnote 4, map 11. 

 33 Not located. 



37 See footnote 20, map 14. 



38 Not located. 



38 » See footnote 3. map 11. 



38b See footnote 19, map 14. 



33 Not located. In the Matricula de tributes (5:88). "Atlan" appears in 

 such association as to suggest a location in northern Veracruz. 



4 « See footnote 41, map 17. The Codex Telleriano-Remensis does not claim 

 conquest of the Mixteca, but refers to an accident in which a large number of 

 Mexican troops drowned, en route to that zone. 



However, conquests in the Mixteca are attested by the Codiee Chimal- 

 popoca, the Anales de Tlatelolco, the Coleccion de Mendoza, the Codex 

 Telleriano-Remensis itself, Torquemada. Tezozomoc, and Ixtlilxochitl. 



41 The sources mention war, but not conquest. 



42 Province located in the southern part of the modern state of Guerrero. 

 Not shown on our map. 



43 Not identified with any modem pueblo; on our map it is shown in the 

 same position it occupies on a sixteenth-century map (No. 57, Coleccion 

 Orozco y Ben a). 



44 In the passage cited, Torquemada does not claim Quetzaltepec as a con- 

 quest, although he does so later (1: 215-216). Confirmation is provided by the 

 Codiee Chimalpopoca, the Anales de Tlatelolco, the Coleccion de Mendoza, 

 and Tezozomoc. 



45 Torquemada has the Mexicans penetrate Guatemala and Nicaragua, as 

 does Ixtlilxochitl (2: 318). This alleged campaign remains vague, without 

 details concerning individual pueblos or battles. In fact, the report is so 

 unconvincing, that these "conquests" have not been entered on our map; 

 and the territory mentioned in the passage of Ixtlilxochtil has not been in- 

 cluded in our list of conquests, since his claims are bombastic and grandiose 

 rather than specific. 



i \ erapaz refers to a sixteenth-century (Torquemada 2: 53) and modern 

 area of Guatemala. 



47 Not identifie I, a ,i -.' twn on our map; Torquemada remarks vaguely 

 that it lies in Chichi n v territory. 



4S Not identified; the Tezozomoc text implies it may not be far from.Ialtepec 

 (map 18, \'o. 107), whore we have placed it with an interrogation paint. 



411 In a number of cases. Dibble's interpretations of the Codiee en Cruz are 

 extremely dubious. 1 or example, the glyph for Jaltianguis shows human 

 tracks instead of the sipn for sand: thai for Tlaxiaco is lacking the drops of 

 water, v. Inch Dibl le f iggests may be effaced. With respect to "Tamoan- 

 ehan," Oil. hie himself states thai the interpretation cannot be defended. 

 To boot, the conquest of Huilotepec is little more than a suggestion. The 

 interpretation ol conquest of Quetzaltepec and Tututepec is even more 

 doubtful, since Dibble leans on othei sources, without being able to demon- 

 strate concrete evidence in the Codiee en Cruz. 



'• The conquests of Caltepec, Jaltianguis, and Tlaxiaco are confirmed for 

 the Triple Alliance, although the Codiee en Cruz claims them for Texcoco: 



Caltepec: Codiee Chimalpopoca, Anales de Tlatelolco, Coleccion de 



Mendoza. 



Jaltianguis: Codiee Chimalpopoca, Anales de Tlatelolco, Coleccion de 

 Mendoza, Ixtlilxochitl. 



Tlaxiaco: see footnote 5 above. 



V. ith respect to the other pueblos the situation may be summarized as 

 follows: 



"Tamoanchan:" Not shown on our map. Meade (p. 89) identifies this 

 pueblo with the ruins of •"Tamtzau" or "Tamchan." in the Huasteca. 

 Dibble suggests conquests in the Huasteca or Totonacapan may be intended. 



