195 



delneho, temef v akropetälnim porädku se dejiciho vetveni, jest skoro vzdy 

 pravidelne trojühelnikovy. Nejvyznacnejsi z udävanych odrüd jest 



f. ambrosioides Nees, Naturg. 1838 p. 450 pro var., jez mä drobounkou 

 stelku dvakräte huste zpefene delenou a vystoupave vetve, z nichz 

 nektere jsou v uzounke laloky dlouze stfihane, kdezto jine tluste, si- 

 roke a skoro nedelene. 



Pearson uvädi tuto formu jako samostatny druh poznamenävaje 

 soucasne (1902 p. 453; tab. CGI.): »This has always been considered by 

 previous writers as a variety of A. multifida, but its usnally dark brown 

 eolour, rigid habit, narrow outline of i'rond, with ascending brancbes, 

 margin of stem and branches usnally minutely erenulate, are charaeters 

 whieh I consider make it quite worthy of specific rank«. Boulay (1904 

 p. 173.) naproti tomu tvrdi, ze var. ambrosioides, jiz mel prilezitost ze 

 sbirky Babenhorstovy (c. 463.) a Husnotovy (c. 198.) ohledävati jest 

 jen mladä, nevyvinutä, ve vsem drobnejsi forma. Pokud nase zkuse- 

 nosti näm dovoluji, pfiklonujeme se k näzoru hepatikologa francouzskeho 

 üplne. 



26. Aneura latifrons Lindberg in Soc. pro F. et Fl. fenn. die 8. Mart. 

 1873, et in Bot. Notiser. 1873 p. 62., Manipulus Muse, Acta soc. F. Fl. 



fenn. 1874, v. XIII. p. 372. 



Limpricht, Kryptogamenfl. Schles. 1876 p. 333., Stephani, Deutschi. 

 Jung. 1879 p. 66., Speeies hep. 1900 p. 268., Sydow, Leberm. 1882 p. 71., 

 Dedecek, Mechy jatrov. 1883 p. 29., Leberm. 1886 p. 23., Heeg, Leberm. 

 1893 p. 124., Klinggraeff, Leber- u. Laubm. 1893 p. 47., Cooke, Hand- 

 book of brit. hep. 1894 p. 264., Pearson, Hepaticae 1902 p. 454., Vele- 

 novsky, Jatrovky 1903 p- 10., Warnstorf, Leber- u. Torfm. 1903 p. 113., 

 Loeske, Moosflora 1903 p. 46., Boulay, Hepatiques 1904 p. 175., Migula, 

 Kryptogamenfl. 1904 p. 422., Lacouture, Tableaux 1905 p. 60., Müller, 

 Leberm. 1907 p. 341., Macvicar, Stud. Handb. of brit. hep. 1912 p. 86., 

 Lorch, Torf- u. Leberm. 1914 p. 95. 



Delin.: Stephani, Deutsch!. Jung. 1879 fig. 127, Cooke, Handbook of brit. 

 hep. 1894 p. 265., Pearson, Hepaticae 1902 tab. CCIL, Velenovsky, Ja- 

 trovky 1903 tab. X. obr. 5., Warnstorf, Leber- u. Torfm. 1903 p. 117. 

 fig. 4., Migula, Kryptogamenfl. 1904 tab. LVI. f. 3., Lacouture, Atlas 

 1905 p. 46., Müller, Leberm. 1907 p. 342 fig. 204., Macvicar, Stud. Handb. 

 of brit. hep. 1912 p. 86. 



Exsic: Gottsche-Eabenhorst, Hep. europ. exsicc. no. 202., 203., 493. (typ. 

 sec. Lindb.!) 613., 614. Jack-Leiner-Stitzenberger, Kryptog. Badens ex- 

 sic. no. 945. Husnot, Hepat. Galliae exsic. no. 200. Carrington a. Pearson, 

 Hep. Britannicae exsic. no. 288., 289. Funck, Kryptog. Gew. d. Fichtel- 

 geb. no. 557. Massalongo, Hep. Ital. Venet. exsic. no. 94. 



13' 



