18 



67. Talaurinus niveovittatus, Ferg. — Queensland: Mount 



Tambourine (A. M. Lea). 



68. Talaurinus kirbyi, W. S. Macleay. — New South 



Wales: Blue Mountains. 



69. Talaurinus carinatus, F 'erg. — Victoria: Nelson (Black- 



burn). (Co-type.) 



70. Talaurinus incanescens, Macl. — No locality. 



71. Peritalaurinus macrocephalus, Ferg. — Western Aus- 



tralia. A fine pair of this species from Blackburn's 

 collection, wrongly labelled "T. rugiceps, Macl." 



72. N otonophes cichlodes, Pasc. — The specimen sent is the 



one Sloane had under examination in describing the 

 genus. 



73. Pseudonotonophes lemmus, Pasc. — A new generic 



name seems necessary; the description of the genus; 

 is awaiting publication in my Revision. 



74. Sclerorinus water housei, Macl. — South Australia;. 



Central Australia. Two S 's without exact locality 

 labels. 



75. Sclerorinus adelaidai, Macl. — Australia, no locality. 



A specimen which I regard as only a form of this 

 exceedingly variable species. 



76. Sclerorinus vittatus, Macl. — Ardrossan; South Aus- 



tralia (Tepper). Specimens from South Australia, 

 without locality, and from Ardrossan agree with the 

 type in form and appearance, but exhibit, inter se, 

 great variability in the number, size, and position of 

 the elytral tubercles. Specimens from Grange, 

 South Australia, agree fairly well with both the 

 types of vittatus and conspersus, and I see little 

 reason for separating the two species beyond a slight 

 difference in shape and the somewhat smaller 

 tubercles. S. rugicollis and S. angasi are, in my 

 opinion, undoubtedly conspecific with S. vittatus. 



11 . Sclerorinus, sp. ( ?) — A single S allied to vittatus, and 

 perhaps only an extreme variety. In the absence of 

 further specimens, it would be unwise to deal with 

 it at greater length at present. Australia, no 

 locality. 



78. Sclerorinus sordidus, Macl. — South Australia : Victor 

 Harbour, Adelaide, Mount Lofty. Others without 

 exact locality. A fairly large series of specimens, 

 which I regard as referable to this species. The 

 species is close to S. vittatus, but has more dingjr 

 clothing and less prominent tubercles concealed by 

 the clothing; in these respects, however, the series 

 shows considerable variation, this being more marked. 



