140 Miscellaneous Intelligence. 
want of authentic specimens for comparison. Nor has the author 
always paid sufficient attention to the labors of some of his prede- 
cessors, having allowed a number of prominent are ag 
Skandinavian naturalists to escape him altogether.* Then 
clature introduced by sod hagSe is on the whole very conde 
ble; the statement he makes “of several histological and ana- 
tomical points is somewhat meager, the results of various Gennatl 
writers bearing on the ect having escaped his attention, and 
thus due credit is ieieaensosclly not always given to the original 
Faunal works which have. appeared since the cablnentiae of his trea- 
tise, show that he hg given too narrow limits to his Faunx, and 
that we must have a larger amount of material than can be collect- 
ed from the pbactrstions of ce torest of Grubet or of Kinberg,§ 
as the results of various scientific explorations in different parts 0 
the globe, before any satisfactory conclusions can = reached, e 
s “oh baba ihe ee su re see as we now have in the 
moirs o Malmgren] on the Sachats Annelids 
ward. There is no coast which when ay ale ie tess will not 
amply repay its explorer, and no district, however po 
ance, where a rocky point rations be found oik will reward the 
w 
have from our own coasts and the European coasts of the Atlantic 
in memoirs already published and the collections of the various 
Museums of the new and old world. 
The difference to be noticed in the og of species eee 
of Cérst 
nin his two memoirs and t old fauna 
* Particularly the monograph of Kinberg in Engenies Resa _— the — 
notices of Sars on eras Annelids, which contain much of im 
Wirbellose Thiere. : 
E. Grube, Die Anneliden d. Novara Expedition. 
Kinberg in manag ncaie Resa. 
Dr. Malmgren, ulata polychaeta Spitzbergiac, 1867; Nordiska Hafs Au 
nulater, 1865 
nnélides Turbellariés, Opalines, 1861 ; uate des Oligo- 
chétes, td Glanures Zootomiques, 1864; Beobachtungen w ber Wirbellose 
Thiere, 1863; Annélides du Golfe de Naples, 1 868. 
