The plant here figured exists in some collections under the name of 
L. Youngii, though I know nothing about its origin, and cannot find that it has 
d. A flower from the collection of Sir Trevor Lawrence, Barr., 
is scarcely distinguishable from the one just named. The 
ficient to settle the question of the identity or otherwise 
therefore venture to consider the present one as 
Moss’ plant belongs to this species, it is 
intained, but it is perhaps safest to take 
ever been describe 
of Burford, Dorking, 
materials at hand are insu 
of these three forms, and I 
a variety of L. macrobulbon. If Mr. 
doubtful if the varietal name can be ma 
and also to decide the limits of two or three other species of the same group. 
They are well worthy of more extended cultivation. 
R. A. Rote. 
the course now proposed. Further materials may enable us to settle the question, . 
