E. &. Holden—On supposed changes in Nehida M. 17. 

 Table II.— Hebschel's SxAB-POsmoNa 



AR.A.froin AN.P.D.from | 

 rc^ Hmarc. |£ 



a the column " Class" 1 



lineations from known stars; 

 srere derived from the 

 down by the eye on the chart. 



I g! hI'p.^s. ^^' 





Table III.— C 



MPXBISOK 





%i 



-1^ 



Lasseli's 



Lamont'a 



1J 





11 



11 



Tromf' 



«•■ 



Remarks. 





15 



239r 



??;r 



""oT 



No. 1. Laasell's distance 133-1'; La- 



















342-4 



341-3 





.\:^-^^\^ri^'r-rzs.t:i 













10 











altogether, Lamont's angle becomes 



ii 



« 



2991 



299-6 



-0-5 





No. 



h': 



Masor 



1839. 



Lasse 



J 1862. 

 ... 



Trouvel 



.tl8»5. 



^Remarks 





1 



+ 66-0- 

 -166-8 



+ 200-4 

 + 181-2 



-124-2" 

 + 280-2 



-i?io 



-^3?'l 

 -'45-0 



+ 365-9 



+ 68-3' 

 1^18-6 



Il3?-8 



- 12-8 



-1161' 



1' 



7352-6 



+ 64-5' 

 + 166-6 



til 



ty- 



