68 G. J. Brush’s Mineralogical Notices. 
been derived from some unknown mineral. We are not in pos- — 
session of facts which warrant a positive decision. Some of the 
ti —— certainly have the lustre, color, and general aspect 
of elzoli 
SiH Pe Pe Mn Ge ily Ke H 
27:50 1:30 224 530 1:91 7-00 T.S. Hunt. 
7 de a 27°60 ri —- 280 1:30 502 2:78 688 - 
48°10 23-70 480 -— 210 141 449 153 8-40 - 
ee 46°65 31:23 369 —- tr. tr. 0501168 tr. 503 Smith & Brush. 
44°78 35:39 2:76 ——- 030 0°59 048 687 3°60 505 
44°94 25:05 3:33 -— tr. 844 686 580 tr. G11 bs 
8. " Agalmatolite unk Wee Sees dd etn ok lal irveeiae 
9. Schemnitz, 4950 2745 — 103 t. 556 0-72 1020 5-10 Karafiat. 
1, 2, 8, Hunt, abstract from Geo eal. Rep, Canada for 1852, 95, in this Journal, [2], 
xvii, 127. 4, 5, 6, x analyses of different specimens of dysyntribite showing it to 
bea rock and not simple mineral, this Journal, (2), avi, 50. ae 
i thine: 8, Thomson’s s Mineralogy, i, 9, Pogg. Ann., lxxviii,575. 
2. Compact Pyrophyllite. 
In a recent examination which I have made of some Mote 
b idh eA pa 
eG 
erg. 
Theniy Hunt, of Montreal, pr called my a to the near 
yses 
eseckite of the agree 
Journal, [2], viii, ae and Sneha (ib., xix, 428), 
a wa iy N 
