1920.| J. Stephenson: OUgochaeta from India and E. Persia. 241 



Eutyphoeus mohammedi, Stephenson. 

 Rawal Pindi, N. Punjab. June-July 1917. R. Hodgart. A single specimen. 

 This worm has been recorded only once, previously, from Allahabad (9). I add a 

 few notes on the external characters erf the present specimen ; the internal anatomy 

 corresponds exactly with that of the type. 



The length of the present example was only 39 mm.; its maximum diameter, 

 behind the elitellinn, where it was perhaps unnaturally swollen, was 475 mm. ; the 

 worm is thus short and stout. Segments ea. 160, all very short behind the elitellinn. 

 The prostomium showed no projecting Lobe, -perhaps this was withdrawn within 

 the bueeal cavity; a couple of parallel grooves on the dorsal surface of the first 

 segment indicated that it was tanylobous. 



The setal intervals were as follows: — ab = \aa = §&c = led ; but in front of the 

 elitellinn the mid-ventral distance <ia becomes much smaller. 



The male pores were situated on distinct papillae". 



Eutyphoeus chittagongianus, Mchlsn. 



Above Tura, Garo H ills, Assam; :$,900 ft. On paths after rain. July-Aug. 1917. S. W. 

 Kemp. Two specimens W ' ] , W ' J". 



Above Tura, Garo Hills, Assam ; 3,900 ft. July-Aug. 1917. S. W. Kemp. Two specimens 

 W "•', W ";\ 



Sureil, Darjiling Dist. ; 5,000 it. 11-31-X-1Ü17. N. Annandale and F. Gravely. A .single 

 specimen. 



Nam Ting Pokri, Darjiling Dist. ; 4,(K)0 ft. June-July 1918. »S. W. Kemp. A single speci- 

 men. 



This worm has been described by Michaelsen (3) from two specimens in a bad 

 state of preservation. I therefore add a few notes to supplement the original 

 account. 



External Characters: — The length is various, from 182 to 405 mm.; the maximum 

 diameter is as much as 10 mm. The colour may be a medium olive dorsally, lighter 

 below ; or the worm may be almost un pigmented throughout. 



Secondary annulation is well marked on the anterior segments; iv and v are 

 biannular, vi has two chief and two subsidiary furrows, and succeeding segments as far 

 as the clitellum are primarily triannular, with secondary furrows on the first and last 

 annuli; the post-clitellar segments may also be triannular. 



Setae seem to be sometimes absent on the first four or five segments. 



The male pores, each sunk in a separate pit in Michaelsen's specimens, are often 

 contained in a large transverse furrow which extends across the ventral surface; this 

 furrow has rounded but not tumid lips, and on looking into it the male pores are 

 seen on small transversely oval papillae in the line of setae b. 



The spcrmathecal apertures, in b in Michaelsen's original specimens, and in some 

 of mine, may be between b and c. 



The genital markings, described in the original account as 'intersegmental 



