﻿192 
  SOUTH 
  AMERICAN 
  INDIANS 
  [B. 
  A. 
  E. 
  Bull. 
  143 
  

  

  (20) 
  Chilca 
  (Chilled). 
  Below 
  Lurin 
  is 
  a 
  spot 
  in 
  the 
  desert 
  where 
  the 
  water 
  

   table 
  is 
  so 
  near 
  the 
  surface 
  that 
  crops 
  can 
  be 
  grown 
  if 
  the 
  sand 
  is 
  dug 
  down 
  a 
  

   short 
  distance. 
  It 
  is 
  not 
  really 
  a 
  valley, 
  as 
  no 
  river 
  flows 
  through 
  it. 
  The 
  ingen- 
  

   uity 
  of 
  its 
  water 
  supply 
  greatly 
  impressed 
  the 
  Spaniards. 
  (See 
  Cieza, 
  1554, 
  bk. 
  1, 
  

   ch. 
  73.) 
  

  

  (21) 
  Mala. 
  

  

  (22) 
  Huarco 
  (Guarco), 
  also 
  called 
  Runahuana 
  (Lunahuana, 
  Lunaguana, 
  Runa- 
  

   huanac) 
  and 
  Cafiete. 
  A 
  large 
  and 
  important 
  valley 
  which 
  put 
  up 
  a 
  stubborn 
  res- 
  

   istance 
  to 
  the 
  Inca. 
  (See 
  Cieza, 
  1554, 
  bk. 
  1, 
  chs. 
  73-74; 
  1880, 
  bk. 
  2, 
  ch. 
  59.) 
  

  

  (28) 
  Chincha. 
  Another 
  large 
  valley 
  with 
  a 
  powerful 
  chief. 
  It 
  had 
  a 
  popu- 
  

   lation 
  of 
  about 
  50,000 
  in 
  Inca 
  times, 
  for 
  its 
  chiefwas 
  aHONO 
  koraka. 
  (Castro 
  and 
  

   Ortega 
  Morej6n, 
  1936; 
  Cieza, 
  1880, 
  bk. 
  2, 
  ch. 
  59.) 
  

  

  (24) 
  Pisco. 
  

  

  (25) 
  lea. 
  

  

  (26) 
  Nazca. 
  

  

  (27) 
  Acari. 
  Also 
  called 
  Lomas. 
  

  

  (28) 
  Yauca. 
  

  

  (29) 
  Atico. 
  

  

  (30) 
  Caraveli. 
  

  

  (31) 
  Ocona. 
  

  

  (32) 
  Camana. 
  Part 
  of 
  this 
  valley 
  was 
  inhabited 
  by 
  a 
  people 
  called 
  Mage 
  

   (Maje), 
  for 
  whom 
  the 
  river 
  of 
  Camana 
  is 
  named. 
  Higher 
  up 
  are 
  the 
  Cavana. 
  

   (Calancha, 
  1638, 
  bk. 
  3, 
  ch. 
  30.) 
  

  

  (33) 
  Quilca 
  (Quillca). 
  The 
  river 
  divides 
  into 
  several 
  branches: 
  Sihuas 
  (Sig- 
  

   uas), 
  Vitor, 
  and 
  Chili 
  being 
  the 
  principal 
  ones. 
  Sihua 
  may 
  be 
  a 
  tribal 
  name. 
  

   Arequipa 
  is 
  on 
  the 
  upper 
  Chili 
  River. 
  

  

  (34) 
  Tampo 
  (Tambo). 
  

  

  (35) 
  Moquehua 
  (Moquegua). 
  

  

  (36) 
  Locumba. 
  

  

  (37) 
  Sama. 
  

  

  (38) 
  Arica. 
  There 
  were 
  some 
  ^lymara-speaking 
  colonists 
  in 
  this 
  valley. 
  Be- 
  

   yond 
  Arica 
  is 
  a 
  long 
  stretch 
  of 
  very 
  dry 
  coast 
  which 
  supported 
  only 
  scattered 
  fish- 
  

   ing 
  villages 
  until 
  the 
  nitrate 
  boom 
  in 
  the 
  19th 
  century. 
  This 
  region 
  is 
  generally 
  

   called 
  Tarapaca 
  from 
  a 
  small 
  oasis 
  below 
  Arica. 
  (RGI, 
  1881-97, 
  appendix 
  3, 
  

   pp. 
  xxv-xxvii.) 
  

  

  Bolivian 
  Highland 
  divisions. 
  — 
  In 
  addition 
  to 
  the 
  tribes 
  and 
  valleys 
  already 
  

   listed, 
  it 
  will 
  be 
  well 
  to 
  list 
  the 
  provinces 
  of 
  the 
  Bolivian 
  Highlands 
  where 
  Aymara 
  

   was 
  not 
  the 
  native 
  language. 
  The 
  Aymara-speaiking 
  provinces 
  are 
  listed 
  under 
  

   The 
  Aymara, 
  pp. 
  501-573. 
  

  

  (1) 
  Cochapampa 
  (Cochabamba, 
  Cotabamba). 
  

  

  (2) 
  Yampard 
  (Yanpard). 
  These 
  people 
  occupied 
  the 
  valley 
  in 
  which 
  Chuquir 
  

   saca 
  (Sucre, 
  La 
  Plata) 
  stands. 
  Many 
  colonists 
  were 
  settled 
  here 
  by 
  the 
  Inca. 
  

   (Calancha, 
  1638, 
  bk. 
  2, 
  ch. 
  40.) 
  

  

  (3) 
  Chicha. 
  The 
  Chicha 
  paid 
  their 
  labor 
  tax 
  by 
  furnishing 
  carved 
  logs 
  of 
  red 
  

   wood 
  for 
  sacrifice 
  in 
  Cuzco. 
  (Cobo, 
  1890-95, 
  bk. 
  12, 
  ch. 
  33; 
  RGI, 
  1881-97, 
  

   Vol. 
  2, 
  appendix 
  3, 
  p. 
  xliii.) 
  

  

  (4) 
  Lipe 
  (Lipes, 
  Lipez). 
  Some 
  Aymara 
  was 
  spoken 
  in 
  this 
  province. 
  (RGI, 
  

   1881-97, 
  vol. 
  2, 
  appendix 
  3, 
  pp. 
  xxii-xxiii.) 
  

  

  PRINCIPAL 
  SOURCES 
  

  

  AH 
  modern 
  accounts 
  of 
  Inca 
  culture 
  either 
  concern 
  a 
  limited 
  part 
  

   of 
  the 
  subject 
  or 
  are 
  based 
  on 
  a 
  very 
  small 
  part 
  of 
  the 
  available 
  source 
  

   material. 
  The 
  best 
  known 
  to 
  American 
  readers 
  are 
  Murdock, 
  1934, 
  

  

  