| 
| 
: 
267 
mucida, and on comparison with dried English specimens 
received Wem Miss Wakefield, the spores of the latter are 
found to be similar to those of our doi stg smaller (15°5 
sentatives, and, in spite of the Pane absence of a ring, 
we place them under A. mucida as a variety rather than 
transfer them as a new species to another genus, and so 
lose their obvious affinit ty. 
Pileus ad 10 cm. latus, subconvexus, deinde planus, glutinosus, 
substriatus, albidus ad subfus co-albidus, cuticulo decor- 
ticante. Lamellae subsinuatae, subventricosae, subdis- 
tantes ad distantes, albae. Stipes ad 8 cm. altus, tenuis 
ad basem bulbosus, albus ad Peet 
solidus. Sporae sphericae, granulatae, 155-2 
TRICHOLOMA. 
94. Tricholoma muculenta, Berk.: Hook. J., 1845, p. 43 
Cooke: Handb. Austr. Fungi, No. 50 (W.A.). —The following 
distant, aut adnexed. Ste. white, tied solid, faintly 
stri ate ( 1 2 Caespitose on ‘bare. round. Taste dry speci- 
> 
This 1S ipie with the original description, save that the 
6 p in Berk 
? 
species of Tricholoma agrees with our specimen. There is 
some resemblance between our fungus and the description of 
Russula virginica, Cooke and Massee. The spores pais 
ede. Pricholosnà aie, Er: Byicr., p. 38 ; Cooke: 
Illustrs., p. 87; Massee: Brit. me Flora, iii., p. 182.— 
r Sydney, seems rofarablé to this species. The ebrii 
of Tricholoma coarctata pe 7 Cooke and Massee (Cooke: 
Handb. Austr. Fungi, No. also seems like that of our 
— on ae but fig. 5, given a ‘Cooke, is quite different. 
figure is one reconstructed from a rough med and not 
