MILIOLIDA. 11 
Vien.,’ pl. 18, figs. 10—12), and very many more noticed by D’Orbigny and others, are 
mere modifications of Q. seminulum, with more or less defined angles. 
3. QUINQUELOCULINA SUBROTUNDA, Montagu. 
Srreuta, Walker, 1784. Test. Min., p. 2, pl. 1, fig. 4. 
VsRMICULUM sUBROTUNDUM, Montagu, 1803. Test. Brit., Part 2, p. 521; Fleming, 1823, 
Mem. Wern. Soc., vol. iv., p. 565, pl. 15, fig. 5. 
QUINQUELOCULINA suBRoTUNDA, D’Ord., 1826. Ann. Sc. Nat., vol. vii, p. 302, No. 36. 
~- — Wood, 1843. Morris’s Cat. Brit. Foss., p. 63. 
_ SEMINULUM, var. SUBROTUNDA, Parker and Jones, 1859. Ann. Nat. Hist., 
3rd ser., vol. iv, pp. 336, 341, and 351. 
MILIOLA (QUINQUELOCULINA) suBRoTUNDA, Id., 1865. Phil. Trans., vol. clv, p. 411, pl. 15, 
fig. 38. 
Characters. —A small, roundish, bi-convex variety of Quingueloculina seminulum, Linn. 
Widely distributed in the Atlantic, if not in other seas, accompanying other Afiliole. 
Mr. S. Wood found it in the Sutton Crag, and another example occurred to us; but the 
specimens have been lost." 
A, QUINQUELOCULINA TENUIS, Czjzeh. 
QUINQUELOCULINA TENUIS, Czjzek, 1848. Haid. Abhandl. Wiss., vol. ii, p. 149, pl. 13, 
figs. 31—34. 
— — Reuss, 1851. Zeitsch. Deutsch. Geol. Ges., vol. iii., pl. 7, fig. 60. 
MILIoLA (QUINQUELOCULINA) TENUIS, Parker and Jones, 1865. Phil. Trans., vol. clv., 
p. 41], pl. 17, fig. 84. 
Characters.—Nearly complanate, but often curved, thin, more or less unsymmetrical ; 
presenting an extreme enfeeblement of Q. seminulum, Spiroloculine in aspect, and twisted 
on itself. 
Q. tenuis is small and very rare in the Crag of Sudbourne (specimen lost). It lives in 
the Atlantic and Mediterranean, at considerable depths. It is fossil in some Tertiary beds 
of Germany, and in the Lias of England. 
1 We regret much that we have been compelled to make the remark “ specimens lost,’’ in connection 
with several species, one or two of them amongst the rarest of the Crag Foraminifera. We may explain, 
that quite recently, since the plates which are appended to this Monograph were engraved, we had picked 
out of our latest gatherings specimens of all the forms which had not been drawn, intending to make from 
them a fifth plate. The specimens were packed and sent by post, with a view to their being placed in the 
engraver’s hands, but the parcel miscarried; and, notwithstanding the careful inquiries of the Post-Office 
authorities, which we are bound to acknowledge, it has not been heard of since. Except in the necessary 
omission of figures, and, in one or two cases, the want of details of measurement, the accuracy of the letter- 
press is not affected by the loss. 
