Maryland Geological Survey 2?!> 



Pinus quenstedti Heer 



Pisonia atavia Velenovsky 



Protea liaidingeri Ettingshausen 



Pteris frigida Heer 



Pteris reichiana Ettingshausen 



Pterophyllum cretosum Reich 



Pterophyllum reichianum Engelhardt 



Pterophyllum saxonicum Reich 



Quercus beyriehii Ettingshausen 



Rhamnus tenax Lesquereux 



Rhopala primava Ettingshausen 



Salix schema- Engelhardt 



Sapindus saxonicus Engelhardt 



Sapotacites stelzneri Engelhardt 



Sequoia heterophylla Velenovsky 



Sequoia minor Velenovsky 



Sequoia reichenbachi (Geinitz) Heer 



Simaba ? saxonica Engelhardt 



Sphenopteris mantelli Brongniart ' 



Sterculia geinitzi Engelhardt 



Triplaris cenomanica Engelhardt 



Widdringtonites reichii (Ettingshausen) Heer 



Xylomites ellipticus Ettingshausen 



This list totals 81 species, of which 3 are referred to the Fungi, 16 to 

 the Ferns, 3 to the Cycads, 8 to the Conifers, 2 to the Monocotyledons 

 and 48 to the Dicotyledons. Thirty-five species are peculiar to this 

 locality. Of those having an outside distribution, 21 occur in the con- 

 temporaneous Perucer schichten south of the Erzgebirge in Bohemia, 

 and several additional occur in the continuation of these beds in Moravia, 

 13 are found in the Atane beds of Greenland and 6 in the Patoot beds of 

 that country, 5 are found in the Turonian of Europe, 6 in the Emscherian 

 and (i in the Aturian. These include wide ranging forms, like Cunning- 

 hamites elegans, Sequoia reichenbachi and Eucalyptus geinitzi. 



A relatively large number of these Saxon forms have been identified 

 from the Xorth American Upper Cretaceous. Thus there are 11 of these 

 6pecies recorded from the Dakota sandstone, 8 from the Raritan forma- 

 tion and 9 from the Magothy formation of the Middle Atlantic Slope, 

 while others are represented in the Upper Cretaceous floras of the south 

 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain. 



1 This is now referred to Onychiopsis psilotoides (Stokes and Webb) Ward. 

 The determination of the Saxon remains by Engelhardt is probably erroneous. 



