¢ 
Review of Darwin’s Theory on the Origin of Species. 161 
cal forces, etc., etc.”* Mr. Agassiz, however, pronounces that 
“the connection between the facts is only intellectual ;’—an 
eral in our day, we shall not despair; being confident that 
© genius of an Agassiz will be found equal to the work of 
bine 2g, upon the mental and material foundations com- 
so a theory of nature as theistic and as scientific, as that 
TN he has so eloquently expounded 
hat the existing kinds of animals and pl ed f 
plants, or many 0! 
them, may be Seivel from other and earlier kinds, in the lapse 
* 
- Cit., p. 181.—One or two Bridgewater Treatises, and most modern works 
on I Theology should have rendered the evidences of thought in inorganic 
not “unexp: ecte 1.” 
“COND SERIES, Vor. XXIX, No. 86.—MAROH, 1860. 
21 
