Zoo geographical Investigations in Southern Greenland. Soil 
Kvanefjord | Bredefjord Sermilik Skovfjord | Tunugdliarfik 
este he aloe elo wel = ie tel is 
@ (gS|/ a |? ssi a ]e esl a |S Bs & | es) a 
NEES SAGAN Se TSCA Sad VO) aa 
Astrogonium Parelii ..... Sent [fasee ait veces (lesan persia tt 
BrenORMRCHSRCHSpALUS ..<-)ase| ok Re WK xe | SA We | eT ae Wk} eh x 
Ophiura Sarsii .......... Senie Sell ox ade dl eae ee. ol Caceres tlle ince al Accu oreal lame 
— robusta ........ 50) || fom lle bie Siar. |] 484 Sa oet| cae Hieeel||) cece lens 
Ophiocten sericeum ..... 3 5a|| SS Sell aren eae lines 
Mpbiopholis aculeata .... || .. | .. | «. || x |xx}] x js. | ..] «. fs. | x x 
Amphiura Sundevalli.... | .. | .. | .. {Ix FSO lige: femelle Mis | 
— GONMCTENE, ob Iisa Iso I! oo [ba | abel ye 
Ophiacantha bidentata .. || .. | x x el BS ESS) ten ees we wh tl x ee uiire. x 
— FNDMIEIE ose. |||oe- ||! col, Go-ulll- sel see x | | 
Bintvoscolex2lacialis; 2.5) | as |e. il sel OX | | 
Ophiolebes claviger ..... 55. esech, | ace | oceeeel lpenrerl te 
Gorgonoceph. Lamarckii . | .. | ..| .. || .. | .. | x 
Strongylocentr. droebach. || x | x | .. || x |xx] x |... ]..] .. xx] x Sa |ieev |i 
Myriotrochus Rinki..... Sahl se | Paes Sal peel rege lly oreo ili estan |i massis x | 
Chirodota laevis ........ Sel aie deen IW OX | 
Eupyrgus scaber ........ eal tate Hate sion He 
Molpadia oolitica ....... eel ieee slalie cei allt eateenll haesier ili ua | 
itaetmogone violacea.... | .. | .. | .. || .- | .. | x 
Cucumaria frondosa ..... eer lfigceee semen cule ules 
os calcigera ..... x 
Phyllophorus pellucidus . x 
Psolus Fabricii ......... ars] | Wectere |W retes | orate lees x 
— phantapus....... eel |lier= coal Meeks | ache oo x 
— valvatus......... Oe. Nec hese lice lpr feces 
As will be seen from the foregoing list, by far the greatest yield 
was obtained from the Bredefjord, which appears to be due not only 
to the fact that most of the dredgings were made in this fjord, but also 
to its being the richest water. Only a few of the forms found there pene- 
trate up into Sermilik. Very much the same may be said of Skovfjord 
as compared with Tunugdliarfik, thus distinctly indicating that the fauna 
grows poorer from the mouth of the fjords inward. Kvanefjord is seen 
to be far poorer than Bredefjord, and this despite the fact that the mouth 
only of this latter was investigated, which one would suppose to be the 
richest portion of the fjord. 
With regard to vertical distribution, and comparison between the 
different fjords, the list speaks for itself; some few features should, ho- 
wever, be pointed out. The results are based chiefly on the material 
