37 
Maris pygidio sat convexo, opaco (apice anguste nitido), minus 
perspicue nn setis ut elytra vestitis ; ; tibiis posticis 
manifeste flex 
Femin: pygidio latos ut maris sculpturato et vestito, es 
postiea nitida in medio retrorsum me oeg ep 
tibiis posticis haud flexuosis. Long., 
Closely allied to C. armiger, Westw., but a ven rm with 
the clypeal teeth shorter, and having the outline of the prothorax 
notably different. The lateral margin of that segment runs from 
well-defined angle runs nearly straight (but slightly inward) 
nearly to the base where it makes another angle, from which it 
runs very obliquely to bee base. = outline ‚between the front 
the clypeal structure altogether peculiar, and Jaticollis, Pasc. 
(which is very slightly described) is stated to be much larger than 
the insect before me (long., 7 L) with the prothorax wider than 
the elytra (in the present insect it is measurement slightly 
ee than the elytra), n it is implied that the prothorax 
s of the same shape as in ar 
N.S. ee Richmond R (simt by Mr. Lea). 
C. armiger, Westw. The male of this species has the hind 
tibize watery flexuous and the pygidium very similar to that of 
C. minor, while the pygidium of the female resembles that of 
C. minor in having a nitid apical space dilated hindward in the 
middle, —but the shape of the dilatation is very different in the 
two species, being in minor a sma l triangular space in the middle 
minor it is acu 
LABROMA. 
L. horrens, Shp. Mr. Lea has recently sent to me for =. 
fication a mea of this insect. Dr. Sharp (Rev. and Mag. 
Zool. 1873, p. 262) in characterising the genus stated that the 
type had no front tarsi, but that very probably they had been 
broken off. The example before me has front tarsi very similar 
o those of Cephalodesmius, to which genus it is very close. 
