116 
^ Congeneric with a species I described in Tr.R.S., S. A., 1892, 
pp. 220-221, but referred to Selenurus subject to the doubt I 
have already expressed (loc. cit). 
Victoria (Fernshaw). 
TELEPHORUS. 
T. pulchellus, Macl. var. D notophilus. IT have before me two 
Eee belonging to the S.A. Museum, which appear to be a 
kable variety Oca. pulchellus. They differ from the type 
in si Kavi ving a wide very conspicuous and dine ply limited yellow 
fascia on the elytra a little behind the middle. I can, however, 
find no other difference. I have seen hundreds of specimens of 
T. pulchellus, but never one (except these) in which the elytra 
were not unicolorous. The specimens before me are from Carrie- 
ton (South Australia) and are male and female. 
CLERIDZE. 
The Australian Cleride are much i n need of revision, such 
nothing to do. The following notes are a contribution to the 
task of reducing them to order 
I am not aware of the existence of any memoir showing the 
relation to each other of the various genera among which the 
des Coléoptéres," where such of the Australian genera as were 
known forty-three years ago find a piss among the Clerid genera 
of the world, and some memoirs by t e Rev. IL orham 
dealing with such as were known of en in certain groups of 
the Cleride twenty-four years ago, where again they are placed 
among the Cleride of the world belonging to those groups. 
statement ofthe characters distinguishing the genera to which 
the known Australian Oleride can be referred for the use of 
students in Australia 
Herr Lohde has recently published a catalogue of the Cleride 
of the world, which is of the highest possible value, and includes 
nearly all the corrections that have been made in the generic 
position of the Australian species, but as a large part of the 
erroneous generic determinations ot the bibit describers have 
ti 
known to occur in Au serata and then furnish more particular 
notes concerning some of those genera, together with the diag- 
