Geological Surveys of Kentucky and Arkansas, 239 
t} eof f } ] Tv 
. } ] 1 " P L 1 
n 
SE techan, Varrentrap, Weber, &c. &c., would by fault of 
od or by carelessness return anything but results that were 
Sr eeestoos material to operate upon B us look at some 
“i elr figures e tabulate a number of them taken at ran- 
mullof Lime. Potash. Sulphuric acid. Phosphoric acid. 
Elden a, 0°39 0°93 0:08 0:06 
a, b. 0°75 2°06 —- 0-17 
Ch Ole 0:12 0°02 0°40 
a, 0°802 3°825 — 0°042 
Beesdan, b. 0-039 0°490 - 0-046 
ce. 0-715 0-792 0004 0°007 
Neus a 1:692 3°531 0:050 0051 
ensund, 46. 0-614 1-289 0-038 0-010 
6. 6728 1°243 0-241 0-121 
ai a 2312 1112 0-040 0057 
ae b. 2°67 1:14 0-08 0°20 
c osu! 0°201 0°022 0-014 
F a, 0-420 1155 0:016 0-004 
rankenfelde, 1 6. 1-081 —_— — 0°418 
c. 0°461 1456 0015 0-071 
‘ " we run over these figures and those of the entire series of 
= yses, we find that different determinations disagree to such 
n extent as to make it the sheerest folly to base any calculation 
