92 MEMOIRS OF THE CARNEGIE MUSEUM 
Oblong, cylindrical bead of green mottled jadeite. Length 2.5 cm., diameter 
eon, Jed; DMIGNVAL.. erie. 200). 
Amulet of greenish gray jadeite, flat and thin, representing human head orna- 
mented with head-dress. Height 3 cm., breadth 2cm. PI. XLVI, Fig. 27. 
Amulet of greenish white jadeite, flat and thin, representing human head. 
Height 3.5 cm., breadth 2.7em. Pl. XLVI, Fig. 28. 
Claw-shaped amulet or pendant of mottled, greenish white jadeite. Height 4.4 
em., breadth 1.7 em. PI]. XLVI, Fig. 29. 
Claw-shaped amulet or pendant of mottled greenish white jadeite. Height 3.2 
em., breadth 1.8 em. Pl. XLVI, Fig. 30. 
Claw-shaped amulet or pendant of mottled greenish white jadeite. Height 2.6 
em., breadth 1.1 em. Pl. XLVI, Fig. 31. 
Oblong, cylindrical bead of mottled whitish green jadeite. Length 2 em., diam- 
eter 1.8cm. Pl. XLVI, Fig. 32. 
Thin, flat bead of mottled whitish green jadeite. Diameter 1.8 cm., thickness 
0.3em. PI. XLVI, Fig. 33. 
Thin, flat, circular bead of mottled whitish green jadeite. Diameter 1.2 cm., 
thickness 0.2 cm. Pl. XLVI, Fig. 34. 
Cylindrical tube of greenish white jadeite, widening towards both ends. Length 
2.1 cm., diameter 1.1 cm. Pl. XLVI, Fig. 35. 
Cylindrical tube of greenish white jadeite. Length 3.7 cm., diameter 1.1 cm. 
P|. XLVI, Fig. 36. 
Pendant, bell-shaped, flat and thin, of greenish white jadeite. Height 2.5 cm., 
breadth 1.8cm. Pl. XLVI, Fig. 37. 
Pendant of translucent, green jadeite adorned with vertical parallel incisions at 
the lower end. Height 1.6 cm., breadth 1.3 cm. Pl. XLVI, Fig. 38. 
RECAPITULATION. 
The collections made at Las Guacas show that in this region the art of the stone- 
cutter and polisher had reached a remarkably advanced stage of development. 
If we compare these stone artefacts with similar vestiges of the art of the main- 
land of Costa Rica, more especially with the relics of the culture of the Gtietares of 
the Atlantic coast and the highlands (the Pacific slope and coastland are as yet 
almost unexplored) we observe, as already pointed out, not only marked differences 
in general shape and in ornamentation, but that several entire groups of stone arte- 
facts are limited almost exclusively to one region, while missing in the other, a few 
stray objects alone excepted. We search in vain in the upland regions for most of 
