526 À KAZEM-BEG, 
bed in this part of his work, both the expedition of this leader and that of Sa’id the son of 
Amr; but he omitted the death of Djerrâh or mistook him for Sad. 
Remark 2. page 517. 
This place of the Derbend -nämeh differs in all the three copies in my hands. Klaproth'’s 
translation says, that 4bd-oul-alla (or rather Abdullah) Bahili, the governor of Armenia in ‘ 
103, was replaced by Æbdullah, the son of H'hekim, who dispatched Djerrah with 6000 men 
against the infidels &c. In the MS. of St. Petersburg it is asserted that: deb al ue 5 
soi plus y Eli (Jobs x al] De bl Li (CS) SE quil ee Aou) LL, bols: 
i. e. »In the year 103 of the Hijret Abdul-Aziz-Baheli (who was the governor of Armenia, or 
according to our MS., that of Gandjeh and Shirwän), having left this world for Paradise, (the 
Khalif) appointed Æbdullah Hakim (Hekemi) with his son, instead of Abdul- Aziz Bahili, &c. 
The account in the MS. of St. Petersburg is the more satisfactory, because its assertion as well 
as that of our MS, is, that Muslimeh had bestowed Armenia before on Abdul- Aziz: consequently 
Abdullah Hekemi must have been placed in Armenia instead of 4bdul- Aziz. 
In all the copies of the Derbend-nämeh, Djerräh is surnamed oJas 92) Abü-Ubeideh, but 
this is a fault. Teberi calls him the son of Æbdullah which may justify the assertion m the 
St: Petersburg MS. in one place which says; «they sent Æbdullah with his son, instead of 
Abdul-A ziz». The same Djerräh, in Hajé Khalifeh, is called he Hekemi, which better illus- 
trates the idea. Our author has apparently confounded this Djerräh with one of the same sur- 
name , called o Jase pol who was the successor of Khdlid in the viceroyalty of Syria at the time 
of the second Khalif. 
Remark 3. page 517. 
Both in Klaproth’s translation and in the Petersburg MS. we here find CHAR Pâäshenk or 
Päshenek as the name of the son of the Khagkan; but in our MS. in some places we have ail 
Päsheh and in others ail 02) jgù the Royal Prince Püsheh. In Teberi he is named ut Narji 
and Jeol Narjil, but im Mir-khond, as we have already observed, he is called és Fet'h. 
Concerning the Emperor of China being engaged in war against the Arabs &c., see Part IL. 
Remark 5, 
- Remark #. page 517. 
In Klaproth's translation it is stated, that the son of the Khagkan came into the vicinity of 
« Kaïeh-kend», but in the St. Petersburg MS. we find, that he arrived at the fortress of Æesin 
Lu which was near Gkayeh-kend. In the same MS. in another place, Hesin is also said to 
have been a fortress near Gkayeh-kend on the. top of a mountain, and that its ruins were to 
