Derbend-ndmeh or the History of Derbend. 587 
was imprisoned in Berdw’, and Derbend beïñg taken out ‘of his hands was given to Aebiatul- 
bahili. In consequence of the oppression of Jeïune his (ï. e. Hashim's) son, who was secretly 
on good terms with the infidel Khazars, the inhabitants of Derbend were scattered to Shirwan 
and other places. » 
From this account we understand, that this Jeine was not the governor of Derbend, but 
the son of the governor Hashim, probably the same who with Ibrähim had accompanied Yezid 
the son of Asad, of whom we had occasion to speak in a quotation from the same MS. o 
St: Petersburg in our Rem, 7, to the preceding part VIL. In Klaproth’s translation Jeïüne is 
sa d to have been the son of Vodjem, the son of Æashem. In another ‘place of the MS. be 
longing to the Imperial Library of St. Petersburg we find a second Jeiüne the son of Vejim (see 
the continuation of Dr. Dorns version of the Derbend-nämeh torming a supplement to Part 
VIII. of our work) who lived im 250 of the Hidjreh , ï. e. about 90 years previous to the epoch 
indicated here in this place in all the three versions: perhaps indeed there were two Jeiünes. — 
The word Ouz-bek m Klaproth’s translasion has no connexion with the subject. 
Remark 3. page 582. 
In our MS. there is no name mentioned, but in the MS. of St. Petersburg and in Klap- 
roth’s translation we find Æaroun who was indeed at that time (he was established in the year 
170) the Khalif of Bagdad. 
Remark #. page 582. 
In Dr. Dorn’s version we have erroneously K*2+ for (tj. Klaproth makes him the son 
of Djazimeh. Is not this the Hazimeh, whom Masüdi takes for the progenitor of the tribe of 
al > 3) ? (see there for asl>35), — 
Remark 5. page 582. $ 
In the MS. of St. Petersburg in this place it is saïd, that this governor supplied the channels 
of Derbend with water (529 ge das Dhs). 
Concerning Jeiune’s followers being seized by Hazimeh and sent to the Khalif, we also 
find in the MS. of St. Petersburg the same as is stated in Klaproth’s translation, In this 
lace of our MS. there is nothing on the subject; but a little before it is mentioned, that 
« Rebiatu-l-bähili no sooner arrived in Derbend than he arrested the son of Vejm, put his 
less in irons and sent him to the presence of the Khalif, » 
Remark 6. page 582. 
In Klaproth's translation we read Haffah, and in the MS. of St. Petersburg U2%; we have 
preferred the last, since we know it is a proper name, while dsñe or dès we have never heard 
