702 A. Kazem-Beg, 



Pages, 

 makyieh, (built by Yezid) Magkatir and Maaragka; the situation of the last two. — 



7) Continuation of D r . Dorn's version omitted in our MS. * etc 574- — 580 



Part Vin. 



Nejm is appointed governor of Derbend. His rébellion. Rebi'a is dispatched to 

 dépose Nejm. Hazimeh is dispatched to Derbend by the Khalif. — Haroun ( the 

 Khalif) is said to hâve visited Derbend. His new arrangements there etc. .581 —582 



Klaproth's extract 583 



Continuation of D r . Dorn's' version of the Derbend-Nameh with an English trans- 

 lation forming a supplément to part VIII. of this work: it contanis some 

 narratives concerning tho state of Derbend from the year 190 till 260 of 

 the Hidjret 584-585 



REMARKS AND ILLUSTRATIONS TO PART THE EIGHTH. 



1) Haroun of our version must be Mehdi. — 2) A comparative note ou Jeiune. — 4) He- 

 zimeh. — 6) A comparative note ou Bafadz. — 8) A notice on a «Stone vault» in 

 which the sons of Harounur-Rashed are supposed to hâve been buried .... 585 — 589 



Part IX. 



The Khalif appoints the income from the Springs of Naghtha in Bakou for the 

 benefit of the in habitants of Derbend etc. — Disorders in Derbend on the 

 conséquence of the rébellion of Bi-Shutur. — The continuation af thèse 

 disorders in the whole of Daghistan etc 590 — 591 



Continuation of D r . Dorn's version of the Derbend-Nameh with an English trans- 

 lation answering to part IX. 



Article t st 592 — 593 



Article 2 d . 594 



REMARKS AND ILLUSTRATIONS TO PART THE NINTH. 



1) A historical note on the state of Daghistan and Aderbijan towards the close of the III 

 Mahommedan Century. — Shirwan- Shahs. — 2) On the history and etymology of Bakou. 

 Naphtha in the province of Bakou, différent sorts of it; the history of its springs ; 

 their gênerai state in 1837. — Sait in the Peninsula of Apsharàn; its principal lakes; 

 their gênerai state in the same year. — 3) A historical notice on the state of Ader- 



* In the last note to thèse remarks (page 126 note /) I hare expressed my suspicion that <4* of the présent 



day may be not the <tL» of the ancient geographers? But reading the note 87 to the Appendix, one may clearly 

 see that it is an error into which I hâve fallen. 



