1896.] N.N. Vasu—Chronology of the Sena Kings of Bengal. 17 
following succession of kings in Hastern and littoral Bengal with in- 
itial years of their reigns. ! 
In Hastern and littoral Bengal :— 
A.D. 
986. I. Vira-séna. 
1006. iJ. Samanta-séna. 
1026. Il. Hemanta-séna. | 
Yn the whole of Bengal :— 
1046. IV. Vijaya alias Sukha-s6na. 
1056. V. Ballala-sena. 
1106. VI. Laksmana-séna. 
4136. VII. Madhava-séna. 
1138. VII. Kécava-séna. 
1142. IX. Agéka-séna. 
In Vikramapur. 
Ballala-séna. 
Su-séna. 
Sura-séna, &e. 
C. Sir Alexander Cunningham on the authority of the inscrip- 
tions of Deopada, Tarpanadighi, Bakargaiij and of the Ain-i-Akbari 
gives a fresh list. # 
A.D. 
650. Vira-séna, from whom descended 
975. Samanta-séna. 
1000. Hémanta-séna. 
1025. Vijaya-séna or Sukha-séna. 
1050. Ballala-séna. 
1076. laksmana-séna. 
1106. Madhava-séna. 
1108. Kécava-séna. 
1118. Laksmanéya (reigned 80 years.—Tabaqit-i-Nasir?). 
1198. Conquest of Bengal by Bakhtiar Khalji.2 
Sir Alexander makes also the following remarks with reference to 
certain princes of this dynasty :— 
‘Now just as we have seen in the case of Gd-pala, the progenitor of 
the Pala Rajas, who is also called by the synonymous names of Bhi-pala 
1 See J. A. 8. B., Vol. XXXIV. pt. I, p. 128, XLVII. pt. I, p. 396; and 
Mitra’s Indo-Aryans, Vol. II. p. 262. 
- 2 Rep. Arch. Sur. XV. p. 158. Ina note on the subject he writes: ‘As A.D. 
1107 was the first year after the expiry of Laksmana’s reign, his death must have 
taken place in A.D. 1106.’ 
Ae ieee) 
