218 J. Rodgers— Pathan Kings of Dehli. [No. 2, 
oe 
(24) and (25) Altamsh. Bull seated to left. Reverse of both, 
Above him :— fefafaa horseman, very rude. 
These two coins I regard as having the Hindi legend of the reverse 
of Thomas’ No. 44 over the bull: —Sri Sultan Lititimisi. Undoubtedly 
‘“litutem ” is on the coin, and I cannot see anything else that it resembles. 
(26) and (27) No king. These two coins have @} watwa over the bull. 
This legend comes over the horseman of some coins of ‘Alau- 
d-din Mas‘atid Shah, see Thomas’ No. 100, p. 122. Over the horseman 
on these two coins is @} Fave: The deciphering of these coins took me 
a long time and caused me much trouble. 
(28) Mahmitd Shah of Malwa. 3) wlhlJ} cnt» 
List} de A494 Bes 869 H. 
This is the third new type of this king given in this paper. I 
obtained it in Dehli. The Malwa coins have not yet been collected 
carefully, although several extensive collections are known. From 
what I have seen of them, they would pay for being collected and edited, 
(29) Nasiru-d-din Mahmid Shah. wlblJ| Livy poli 
pboy cots 
This is a new type of the coins of this king. It shows that he 
introduced this type which was used by Ghiyasu-d-din Balban, Jalalu- 
d-din Firdz Shah, ‘Alau-d-din Muhammad Shah and Qutbu-d-din 
Mubarak Shah and then fell into disusein Northern India, but was used 
by some of the Muhammadan kings of M‘abar. I have never seen a 
second coin of Nagiru-d-din like this. It belongs to my friend L. White 
King, Esq. 
(30) Shamsu-d-din Altamsh, pbs Mt ella dend pled des PP 
pbselt wll} Wytbrged} 
3 IsoJ} Errdy 
This is the only rupee I know of, bearing the joint names of Altamsh 
and his daughter Raziah. IJtisa coin perfectly unique. It shows us 
that we need never be surprised at the results of continued research. 
Things will turn up that nobody ever expected. It belongs to 
L. White King, Esq. 
(31) Ghiyagu-d-din Tughlagq I. wa Lan} _raaigst 
(Posthumous.) Sages] armed} WELW} sla gle 
Iso} Ghse Cojlat}  diloyy aU sly 
ak ouph span on ches 73- H, 
