Appendix III.— BIBLIOGRAPHY. 



In the following - bibliography the literature of the lobster, especially that relating 

 to its habits aud development, will be found to be fairly complete. All papers possess- 

 ing scientific or historical interest to which reference is made, though some of them 

 are of minor importance, have been included. 



Since, in my chapter on the embryology of this species, I have not entered into 

 the comparative development of the Crustacea, it has been necessary to refer to but few 

 general works, and all physiological papers have been omitted when not in the direc- 

 tion of my studies. 



1. Abbott, C. C. Are the "chimneys" of burrowing crayfish designed ? Amer. Nat., vol. xvm, pp. 



1157-1158. Phila., 1884. 



2. Aldrovandi, Ulyssis. A. U. philosophi et medici Bononiensis; de reliquis animalibus exsan- 



guibus libri quatuor, post mortem eius editi: Nempe de mollibns, crustaceis, testaceis, et 

 zoophytis. De astaco. Cap. in, p. 108. 1st ed., fol. Bononi;e, 1606. 



3. Andrews, E. A. Autotomy in the crab. American Naturalist, vol. 24, pp. 138-142, figs. 1-4 (pi. 



vi). Philadelphia, 1890. 



4. Aristotle. On the parts of animals. Transl. by W. Ogle. London, 1882. 



5. Atwood, N. E. On the habits and geographical distribution of the common lobster. Proc. Bost. 



Soc. Nat. Hist., vol. x, pp. 11-12. Boston, 1866. 



6. v. Baer, K. E. Ueber die sogenannte Erneuerung des Mageus der Krebse u. die Bedeutung der 



Krebssteine. Archiv f. Anat., Physiol., etc. Ed. by Johannes Miiller. Pp. 510-523. Berlin, 

 1834. 



7. Baker, H. A letter from Mr. Baker to the president, concerning the stones called crab's eyes, etc. 



Phil. Trans. Eoy. Soc. (abridged), vol. x, part in, pp. 876-879, for year 1750. London, 1756. 



8. Baster, J. Opuscula subseciva. De astacis, torn, n, lib. 1, tab. 1. Harlemi, 1762. 



9. Bate, C. Spence. Notes on Crustacea. Ann. and Mag. of Nat. Hist., 2d ser., vol. vn, pp. 297-300, 



1 pi. 1849. 



10. Bate, C. Spence. Report of the committee api>ointed to explore the marine fauna and flora of 



the south coast of Devon and Cornwall. No. 2. Kept. Brit. Ass. Adv. Sci., 1867, pp. 275-287, 

 pis. i-iii. London, 1868. 



11. Bate, C. Spence. Report on the present state of our knowledge of the Crustacea. Part in. 



Rept. Brit. Ass. Adv. Sci., 1877, pp. 36-55. London, 1878. 



12. Bate, C. Spence. Report on the present state of our knowledge of the Crustacea. Rept. Brit. 



Ass. Adv. Sci., pp. 193-209, pis. v-vn. London, 1879. 



13. Bate, C. Spence. Report on the present state of our knowledge of the Crustacea. Part v. 



Rept. Brit. Ass. Adv. Sci., 1880, pp. 230-242. London, 1880. 



14. Bell, Thomas. A history of the British Stalk-eyed Crustacea. Pp. i-LXVi-f- 1-386. London, 1853. 



15. Belon. De aquatilibus. 1553. 



16. Bergh, R. S. Beitriige zur Embryologie der Crustaceen. I. Zur Bildungsgeschichte des Keim- 



streifens von Mysis. Zool. Jahrb., Bd. vi, pp. 491-528, Taf. 26-29. Jena, 1893. 



17. Berniz, Martinus Bernhardus. Chela astaci mariui inonstrosa. Miscellanea curiosa medico- 



physica Academhe naturae curiosorum, annus secundus, Observatio C, p. 174 (fig.). 1671. 



18. Lo Bianco, Salvatore. Notizie biologische riguardanti specialmente il periodo di maturita ses- 



suale degli animali del golfo di Napoli. Mitth. zool. Stat, zu Neapel, Bd. viu, pp. 385-440. 



1888. 



229 



