55 THE ORCHID REVIEW. 
MASDEVALLIA CALYPTRATA. 
“ How does it differ from M. corniculata, Rchb. f.?”’ (Orch. Rev., mi. 
p. 373). This doubtful point can now be settled. The species was des- 
cribed in 1896 as Masdevallia eclyptrata (Kranzl. in Gard. Chron., 1895, 
xviii. p. 577), the name evidently being a misprint for M. calyptrata, under 
which it was again described shortly afterwards (Kranz. in Notizbl. K. 
Bot. Gart. Berlin, i. p. 83). In 1806, Mr. F. W. Moore, of Glasnevin, 
obtained from the Berlin Botanic Garden what he was informed was 4 
part of the type plant, and it has now flowered and proves to be simply 
M. corniculata, Rchb. f. R. Ack 
Fic. 16. CATTLEYA TRIANZ ARKLEANA. 
The accompanying 
figure represents what may almost be termed a 
model form of Cattleya Trianz, so far as shape is concerned, for the broad, 
gracefully recurved and undulate petals, and rounded lip, render the flower 
particulaly effective. The colour is also very beautiful, the sepals and 
petals being blush pink, and the lip rich purple-crimson, extending into the 
throat so as to obliterate the yellow usually found there. It flowered in the 
collection of John W. Arkle, Esq., of West Derby, Liverpool, in 1895. 
C. T. regalis (Lindenia, t. 580, fig. 2) is very similar, if not quite identical. 
