1834.] 



on the Allahabad Inscription, No. 2. 



341 



Sahasanka (who certainly reigned at Canouje within the limits of 

 these seven centuries), to prove this genealogy destitute of all historical 

 authority. 



Colonel Tod's RajastMn. 

 Vol. ii. pp. 5, 6, 7. 



Nayana-pala conqueror of Canouje — 

 A. D. 470, and thence surnamed 

 Cama-dhvaga, with all his descendants 

 who follow. 



I 

 Padarata or Bharata, his son, king 



of Canouje. 



Punja, do. do. 



I 



I 

 Dharma-bhumbo, do. do. whose 12 



brothers were also founders of great 



Rajput families. 



Aji-chandra, do. do. 



I 

 Udaya-chandra, do. do. 



Nripati, do. do. 



Kenaka-se'na, do. do. 



Sahasra-sala, do. do. 



Megha-se'na, do. do. 



ViRA-BHADRA, do. do. 



Deva-sena, do. do. 



VlMALA-SENA, do. do. 



Dana-sena, do. do. 



I 



Mukunda, do. do. 



I 



Bhudu ? do. do. 

 Raja-sena, do. do. 



I 



Tripala, do. do. 



I 

 SrI Punga, do. do. 



I 



VlJAYA-CHANDRA, do. do. 

 I 



Jaya-chandra, do. do. 



Inscriptions published in the Asiatic 

 Researches, vols. ix. andxv. 



Yasovigraha, or SrI-pala, whose 

 son 



I 

 Mahi-chandra, was father of 



I 

 Chandra-Deva, who became a. d. 

 by conquest king of Ca- 

 nouje about 



Madana-pa'la, his son, who 

 succeeded, 



GOVINDA-CHANDRA, do. do. 



Vijaya-chandra, do. do. 

 Jaya-chandra, do. do. 



1072. 



1096. 

 1120. 

 1144. 

 1160. 



Hence it appears, that the Marwar authorities are correct only as to 

 the unfortunate Jay a Chandra, who died A. D. 1193, and his father 



