1862.] Vestiges of Three Royal Lines of KanyaTculja, Sfc. .15 



^t^gm *rtto sitot^j farow i 



Sauq-or, October 5, 1861. 



* Instead of this, the former decipherment has ''Sffa'^JTn'^r^'^RJJ tj^^jqT- 



t Not -V^T'T as was a ' ; m ' s * ; read. 



X Here I have converted a sibilant into a visarga. 



§ Of the gotra of Darbhin mention is frequent. For Darbhya, see the In- 

 dische Studien, Vol. I , pp. 209, 255 ; and Vol. II., pp. 308, 309 : for Darbhya, 

 Professor Max Muller's History of Ancient Sansk?-it Literature, first edition, p. 

 283 : and, for Darbha, Professor Weber's Catalogue of the Berlin Sanskrit 

 Manuscripts, p. 56, line 7. 



|| Here is an error, but of easy correction. There should have been, of course, 



% The original has, by mistake, -fV^?J°. 



* Amended from TT^r^T. Then follow two unrecognized numerals, deno- 

 ting a dynastic year, and an indistinct compound character of unknown signifi- 

 cance. Further on, the day of the semi-lunation is expressed by a single 

 numeral. It is the same as the first of the two just spoken of. 



