1862.] Three Sanskrit Inscriptions. 117 



xnr^*f}f*re iirf faireTf fp^ ! i 

 f^wmisrfe^rT ^prcrsp^: li ^ ii 



W¥ ^^^TOfl II <= li 



w wit f^ci?: srw ft^Tftr«n^ srfcraTfa ^tf^uidii 



STH IT^T3rcr3TT^Tf^^[W% 



3TWT^ *T§ ^f^T^fc! ^?"=T: || ^ || 

 ^^fai^ : W«3^RTT: fanctSTT I 

 ^W^Tf^T ^Tcp^^irreT: || \^ || 



^isrOr ^^clmr wif*i^T S*r ^prr-|| 

 ^sr«r«rt>Tfa*rwr 3 Bftw?raiRNrr*r i 



* In the old decipherment, ^j<, e^rj7{ ^T.\ 



t Formerly misread ^f^ x^f } " his own city." In the nest line, there was 

 also an error : jj-g, for 3ja^. 



X Not, according to the old reading, qK%. 



§ In place of the m of my predecessor. 



|| It has not been proved, that the Hindus of old times applied the term 



