] 20 Three Sanskrit Inscriptions. [No. 2, 



"5T^T f%fecTW Weft ^f^cT £^> N ^*f¥pp?tf ^Jtltt *W- 

 ^g^T^T3"(%^^: SHR"^!*:: ^r«TW^}^T: ^T^TTH^; ^f^r^^IT^i^t 



f^^rf^cr:? # * * * * * sreftrerirT ^^cft^TiT<T"5ns^3iim- 

 &t ^rrewiu^re §¥rm^R^^iiRT^%Twm^7^f>rLp^sr- 



^T^ iffdl^^fw^TT^T"^ "q-fecf^tBtTiW^ WW^TiK^^^- 



^J ^^T W^T wfSTW^T W cT^T *?i*m || ^ \\ 

 f^^nZWRTTiftfcT ^R^mi^?!^ ii ^ it 



* Formerly altered to and printed oSI^fTT^TT^T'^^T^I'Sf^i'T. 



t So, as I conjectured when I had not yet set eyes on the copper-plate of this 

 grant, we should read, instead of the printed ^frf^fiq'^qf. Here is the second 

 mention of Tripuri in this memorial. 



X The next six syllables are quite effaced. From this point to ^j^jo there is 

 a blank in the old decipherment. My own reading yields little meaning ; but 

 the words are, evidently, unfamiliar technicalities. The receipts styled duslita- 

 sddhydddya must have had to do with the duslita-sddhya-charddlit/aksha, who has 

 already been spoken of. 



§ ^^^ I uave changed to ^}i^«f. 



