220 Translations from the Tdnhh i FiruzShahi. [No. 4, 1869.] 



On account of these rebels too, he put mercilessly to the sword, as 

 a warning to others, the sons and grandsons of Malikulumara, the 

 former Kotwal, who had no knowledge at all of the insurrection, 

 together with every surviving member of his family and his atten- 

 dants, and would not permit their name even to exist in the world. 

 (Ed. Bibl. Ind., p. 242 to p. 282.)* 



* The Persian text of this portion of the translation of 'Aland din's reign has 

 four doubtful words, viz., \\S^.\ Ed. Bibl. Ind. p. 243, 1. 8 from below ; ij[}lj 

 p. 250, 1. 3 ; _yc| p. 252, 1. 12 ; ^jjj) p. 260, 1. 9 from below. 



Addenda. P. 200, note. Eegarding Kilt, vide also Bad. I., p. 233, 1. 7. 



P. 187, first note. There is some confusion regarding the word Kuclii. 

 Badaoni (I., p. 180, 1. 3) says that Fakhruddin i Kuchi, who was Dadbeg under 

 Jalal, was killed with Jalal at Karah ; and Juna, cannot well be the son of 

 Ghazi Malik (Tughluq Shah). 



The misprints in the Society's edition of the Tarikh i Firuz Shahi are rather 

 numerous in the lists of office-bearers prefixed to each reign, though the 

 edition is on the whole good. Ghazi Malik is especially ill-treated. Thus on 

 p. 240, 1. 3 from below, the asterisk is to be put after 4_£)Lc, and for 

 SliaikMk (?) we have to read Sliilmah leg i£li&is*» • and on p. 379, 1. 6, the 

 same correction is to be applied to Shilmak (?). Sliilmah Beg i Bdrgdh is the 

 same as Bdrbeg <-&jb i- e. the Beg of the Court. That Beg was formerly 

 pronounced bale or bik is clear from the names of towns, as Bdrbikpilr, BdrUMbdd 

 (c/. Wazirabad, Khanpur.) 



(To he continued.) 



