406 Milk and Its Products 
Comparative Test of Machines and Methods for the Determination 
of Fat in Milk. (Short, Beimling, Patrick, Babcock, Gravimetric.) 
Mississippi Bull. No. 15, pp. 5-16. 
A Description of Cochran’s Method for the Determination of Fat 
in Milk, for the Use of Dairymen. New York (Cornell) Bull. No. 17. 
Iowa Station Milk Test. (Patrick.) Iowa Bull. No. 8, pp. 295- 
316; No. 9, p. 355; No. 11, pp. 484487. 
A New Method for Determining the Amount of Butter Fat in 
Milk. Mississippi Bull. No. 21, pp. 17-19. 
A New Milk Test. (Beimling.) Vermont Bull. No. 21. 
The Lactanalyt, A New Milk Tester. Vermont Report for 1894, 
pp. 161-162. 
A New Method of Milk Analysis (Short) for the Use of Dairy- 
men, and a Comparison of Its Results with Those Obtained by the 
Churn. Kansas Report for 1888, pp. 149-164. _ 
A Method for the Determination of Fat in Milk and Cream. (Par- 
sons.) New York (State) Bull. No. 19. New Series. 
Feser’s Lactoscope and Fjord’s Centrifugal Controller, described 
in Ontario Report for 1885, pp. 207-208. 
Testing Milk at Creameries. (Short.) Vermont Bull. No. 16. 
The Schoch and Bolender Test Churn. Wisconsin Report for 1884, 
pp. 23-25. 
Description of the Test Churn. Ontario Report for 1885, p. 201. 
The Oil Test for Cream. Wisconsin Bull. No. 12. 
A New Method for Determining Fat in Milk. (Short.) Wisconsin 
Bull. No. 16 and Report for 1888, pp. 124—136. 
The Babcock Milk Test was first described in Wisconsin Bull. 
No. 24 and Report for 1890, pp. 98-113. Improvements and modifi- 
cations are discussed in Bull. No. 31, pp. 3-16; Bull. No. 36, pp. 3-20; 
Bull. No. 52, Report for 1892, pp. 219-244; Report for 1893, pp. 116- 
121. Compared with the Gravimetric Method in Report for 1896, 
pp. 138-143. 
Elsewhere, the method has been described in Pennsylvania Bull. 
No. 33; Washington Bull. No. 18; New York (Cornell) Bull. No. 29, 
pp. 77-80; Colorado Bull. No. 20, pp. 3-10; North Carolina Bull. No. 
113, pp. 101-111; West Virginia Bull. No. 13, pp. 52-57; Ontario Bull. 
No. 61; Bull. No. 93, pp. 5-6; Connecticut Bull. No. 106, pp. 2-9; 
Bull. No. 108, pp. 5-11; Bull. No. 117, Report for 1894, pp. 209-244; 
Maine Bull. No. 3, Second Series; Bull. No. 4, Report for 1891, Part 
II., pp. 71-80; Michigan Bull. No. 127; Illinois Bull. No. 27; North 
Dakota Bull. No. 22; Pennsylvania Report for 1895, Part II., pp. 
