456 BACTERIOLOGY. 



plugging of the capillaries could have had nothing to 

 do, for there are no organisms in the blood to interfere 

 with its circulation. Our hypothesis then with regard 

 to the condition found in our first case of anthrax is 

 again not tenable. Similarly, if an animal that has 

 died of tetanus be examined, we do not find the bacilli 

 in the tissues and circulating fluids generally, and, in- 

 deed, often fail to find them at the point of injury. 

 Plainly, these fatal results following upon inoculations 

 with the diphtheria and the tetanus bacillus, with their 

 accompanying tissue-changes, occur from the presence 

 of a something that cannot be detected by either cul- 

 tural or microscopic methods, and this something can be 

 only a soluble substance that is produced by the growing 

 bacteria at the site of inoculation, gains access to the 

 circulation, and through this channel causes death, for 

 it is hardly to be imagined that the insignificant wound 

 made in the course of inoculation could per se have had 

 this effect. In other words, these latter animals have 

 died from what is called toxcBmia (poison in the blood), 

 a condition conspicuously different from septiccemia, as 

 seen in our first animal dead of anthrax. 



There are, again, other infectious diseases, many of 

 which are known to present variations from what might 

 be considered a typical course, that may still further 

 serve to support the view that infection is a process in 

 which the mechanical effect of organisms in the circu- 

 lating fluids is of little conse(|uence. Conspicuous 

 among these are the infections that follow upon the 

 introduction into the tissues of susceptible animals of 

 cultures of mioroeoacus lanoeolatus (pneumococeus), of 

 the bacillus of chicken cholera, and of the orsranisms 

 concerned in the production of the so-called " hemor- 



