EFFECTS OF PELAGIC SEALING. 175 
the voyage, the profit of the pelagic investment is small. In fact, it is not a matter of 
profit at all, but one of loss. The true nature of the business was plain in 1897, when 
only 38 vessels as against 87 in 1896 engaged in sealing. 
PELAGIC SEALING A SUICIDAL INDUSTRY. 
This effect of pelagic sealing upon itself is interesting and important. The true 
character of the industry can be seen from the following tabulation of its product 
under the regulations of the Paris award: 
Pelagic catches, 1894-1897. 
North- Bering 
west Coast. Sea. 
DBS oe severctslensssivic a ciciarare ats ore raieseeiaal Slane sel Ne misislais tele vials eo sia 24,101 31, 585 
WB98. oscsemisimSneaiaeaisciviees eareeiceieceemceteanes ode wees 12, 122 @ 44, 169 
1896) seeeisicseeactecemies avin aeteare Mee eerceemm ey Somes) 14, 417 29, 500 
1897 oso: comeweies seen: Saskeweae wees ged eeeesecines (Seen cee 7, 857 16, 464 
a In 1895 there were 59 vessels engaged in sealing, as against 37 in 1894. 
* Not only is pelagic sealing a destructive and wasteful industry, but it is suicidal 
in itsnature. Itis at best but an insignificantindustry. It threatens the destruction 
of vastly more important interests and with them its own interests. Pelagic sealing 
preys upon its own capital. The more successful it is the quicker will come its ruin. 
Its bankrupt condition to-day is clearly shown in the declining catch and the 
withdrawal of its vessels. 
THE EFFECT OF THE DECLINING CATCH. 
As the business of pelagic sealing is, so is the fur seal-skin trade. Pelagic sealing 
has until this year in a measure supplied the deficiency occasioned by the decrease in 
the land catch. The combined land and sea catches of 1897, however, number all told 
only about 60,000 skins. The pelagic catch alone in 1894 furnished 140,000 skins. 
The uncertainty and especially the inadequacy of the supply of skins has seriously 
affected the seal-skin market, which as a result is badly demoralized. The effect of 
the shortage of supply in seal skins makes it necessary to substitute other furs. This 
tends to drive the seal skin out of fashion, as the substitute becomes itself fashionable. 
Concerning this phase of the question we may quote the words of one of the best 
informed dealers in fur-seal skins who said in a recent interview: 
The seal skin will probably never go out of fashion so long as the supply is fully adequate to the 
demand. But ifthe supply were to be cut off or reduced too low, it would be necessary to supply the 
demand from other furs and seal skins would go out of fashion. What is worse, with the change of 
fashion the men now employed in curing the skins would have to seek other lines of work and would 
“be lost to the business. When it was again attempted to bring the seal skin into fashion, it would be 
necessary to train up a new set of men. For many years after the resumption of the curing of 
seal skins the results would be so poor and unsatisfactory that they could not be sold to anyone 
familiar with the present grade of skins. It is not likely therefore that, if the seal skin was lost to 
fashion now, it could be brought back within the present generation. 
THE LEGALITY OF PELAGIC SEALING. 
Such is the nature of pelagic sealing, the sole cause of the threatened destruction 
of the fur-seal herd, the sole obstacle which stands in the way of its restoration. 
