I20 BACTJeRIA IN RELATION TO PLANT DISEASES. 



cytoplasmic strands. The quantity of the bacteria may vary in infected cells, and there is a corre- 

 sponding variation in the appearance of these cells. Normal cells contain starch-grains. Cells with 

 no bacteria contain many starch-grains. Those containing a small number of bacteria also contain 

 some starch-grains, the number being in inverse proportion to the number of bacteria. 



Peirce's study of the appearance of the tissue indicates beyond doubt that the nucleus and 

 cytoplasm are seriously injured by the presence of the bacteria and finally destroyed (fig. 31). He 

 looks upon the organism as beyond question a parasite. He says that the direction of the growth 

 of the infection threads can not be determined by the oxygen or the nitrogen of the air, for if this 

 were the case, the strands of bacteria would be found extending toward the periphery of the tubercle 

 in all directions, which is not the case. "Not only do the infection threads run definitely toward 

 the growing-point of the tubercle; they also grow toward the nucleus of each cell (fig. 22) which 

 they enter." Even where at first they seemed not to grow toward the nucleus a study of serial 

 sections showed that such was the case, branches in sections above or below being given off toward 

 the nucleus. 



"Microtome sections, differentially stained, as before described, of carefully fixed growing 

 tubercles of the species of leguminous plants which I have especially studied, show that in most 

 cases the infection threads run definitely toward the nuclei of the tubercle cells." * * * "When 

 infected cells contain any considerable number of bacteria, they cease to be able to divide." * * * 

 "The presence of the tubercle bacteria is not beneficial to the cells which contain the bacteria." 

 * * * " One point more needs to be made clear. Miss Dawson says that it is difficult to conceive 

 how such strictly aerobic bacteria as these can flourish in the cells of such compact tissue as composes 

 the tubercle. This difficulty is of her own conceiving, for do not the cells of the tubercles respire and 

 are they not necessarily supplied with oxygen for respiration ?" * * * " Unless we are to imagine 

 anaerobic respiration for these cells, it is unnecessary to assume it for the bacteria which infest them." 



The following is a synopsis of the long paper by Hiltner and Stormer, published in 1903: 



The "nitragin" inoculations having discouraged growers because very often the results were not 

 what had been anticipated, additional seed and soil inoculations were undertaken and good results 

 were often obtained, care being taken to use bacteria which were more active than those already 

 in the soil. Experiments since 1900 have shown, however, that failure may be due not only to poor 

 virulence but also to conditions which prevent the penetration of the bacteria. In inoculations of 

 pure cultures mixed with soil, success depends on chemical and physical soil conditions favorable 

 to the development of the bacteria. In inoculations by moistening the seed, failure is probably often 

 due to the fact, discovered by the authors, that a substance dissolved out of the seed-coat during 

 germination exerts an injurious influence on the bacteria. 



In spite of many failures, and in spite of the widespread opinion, expressed by Gerlach, that 

 pure culture inoculations are of no value since sufficient bacteria already exist in the soil, the authors 

 are convinced that soil inoculation has a future, since nitragin has given results safely beyond the 

 limit of error in a sufficient number of instances to refute the opposing theory. One of these favorable 

 experiments was that of IvOges who obtained an increase in crop of 124 per cent with field beans, 

 46.7 per cent with peas, and 400 per cent with vetches. In this case the sandy field used had not 

 borne any legumes, except lupins, for a number of years. Seed inoculation was used. The favorable 

 result here was probably due to the fact that the seeds were soaked 24 hours before they were inocu- 

 lated, and hence the bacteria did not have to encounter the injurious substance in the seed-coat. The 

 inoculated seeds germinated more quickly than the uninoculated ones, which had also been soaked. 

 Although this was undoubtedly independent of inoculation it gave opportunity for early and success- 

 ful penetration of the bacteria into the roots. 



When rainy weather follows seed-inoculation, the bacteria may be washed from the seeds to 

 places where they will not be affected by the injurious substance in the seed-coat and yet where they 

 can reach the roots. When suSicient moisture is present, similarly, favorable results may be obtained 

 by the otherwise uncertain method of direct inoculation of the soil. 



Dietrich obtained good results with blue lupin by inoculating the soil 12 days after sowing, when 

 the plants were well started. Rainy weather favored the spread of the nitragin through the soil. 

 His crop from inoculated soil was 65 per cent greater in green substance and 92 per cent richer in 

 nitrogen than that from uninoculated soil. 



The inoculation of the field by strewing inoculated soil can not be recommended universally 

 because results are too dependent upon the weather. If continued dry weather follows the sowing, 

 the probability that the bacteria will reach the roots diminishes daily. 



In some cases where the inoculated fields showed an increase in crop of from 10 to 24 per cent 

 over uninoculated ones, the difference in stand was scarcely noticeable. This fact may explain many 

 seeming failures where the results have been judged only by appearances. 



