S«ri»8 I, giving results with ry», shows a d»eid«d 

 aecr«a»s in total gr^i»n weight of produce. Series II with 

 millet shows an increase, and Series III with weeds shows 

 a decrease. Had dry matter been determined it is probable 

 that, if the results had been averaged for the three series, 

 the total produce where "weeds" were grown would have 

 oxceeded that of the checks. Allowing for the probable 

 difference in dry matter between corn fodder and mixlet, 

 the results in Series II show a very decided incrsaee in 

 total produce where millet was gro*Ti in the corn. The corn 

 fodder as indicated by the gresn weight - suffered a much 

 greater injury in this series than in s«>ries I and III. 



Of field-cured stover where "weeds" grew the injury 

 is not nearly proportionate to that of total fodder. the 

 yi«ld of plat 3, Series II is practicaixy equal to that of 

 the checks. But the yield of ear corn is much reduced 

 in every case. The p&r cent of ear corn to field-cured 

 fodder is less in every case where "weeds" grew except in 

 plat 3, Series I. This reduction is most marked both in 

 weight and per cent of ear maize in Seri^:** II where millet 

 grew. There is less injury in ereTyciis© to ear com from 

 the later sowing of "weeds" (Plat 3) than from the first 

 sowing (Plat 2) : Manifestly, the lowering of the quality 

 further emphasises the injury. 



