- 116 - 



In Table XXXXI, the comparison is made with the 

 productive aapacity calculated from the checks. The 

 method, however. Is not logically correct fbr plats 

 15, 20, and 24 since these were fertilized with sodium 

 nitrate, acid phosphate and potassium sulphate respective- 

 ly. Plats 14, 18, and 23, were fertilized to correspond 

 with the above plats in the order named to dertermine the 

 effect of fertilizers. An attempt was made to correct 

 the calculated productive capacity from the checks by 

 correcting for the effect of fertilizer. (TABLE XXXXII ) 

 The actual yield of 14 was taken for comparison with plat 

 15. 



The number for comparison with plat 20 is secured 

 by subtracting 188 pounds , which is the loss apparently 

 due to the acid phosphate in plat 18, from the normal 

 productive cai)acity (2671# - 188# = 2443#) . 



The number for comparison with plat 24 is se- 

 cured by adding 758 pounds which is the gain apparently 

 due to the potassium sulphate in Plat 23, to the normal 

 productive capacity (3663# -V 758# = 4421#) 



The results from the two methods are about the 

 same except by the latter method (Table Xax77) the increase 

 in plat 24 is less marked. 



When millet was sown in plats 15, 20 and 24, 

 there was an increase in corn fodder. Plat 6 showed a 



