504 Diseases of the Genital Organs 



(15) The data cover twenty-two years, 217 cows and heifers and the 



645 pregnancies recorded. 



(16) The data cover thirty-one months. 



(17) The data cover ten years and include sixty-seven cows and 



heifers. 



Bibliography 

 I. Bang, Prof. B., Die Aetiologie des seuchenhaften ("infec- 



tiosen") Verwerfens, Zeitschrift f. Tiermedicin, Vol. I, p. 



241. 

 II. McFadyean and Stockman, Rep. Departmental Com. Bd. of 



Ag. and Fisheries, Great Britain, on Epizootic Abortion, 



1909. 



III. Testimony of Sir John McFadyean in litigation of Chadwick 



vs. Gorman, Vet. Rec, March 30, 1912, p. 621. 



IV. Stockman, Sir Stewart, Epizootic Abortion, Rep. Tenth In- 



ternational Veterinary Congress, Vol. II, p. 343. 

 V. Bland, G. R., First and Second Reports by the Agricultural 

 Organizer of Oxford County, Englaind, on the Epizootic 

 Abortion Experiments carried out in 27 herds, 1911 to 1916, 

 Oxfordshire, England. 

 VI. Moore, V. A., and Fitch, G. P., Rep. N. Y. State Vet. Col. at 



Cornell University, 1912-1913, p. 89. 

 VII. Williams, W. L., Rep. N. Y. State Vet. Col. ft Oonnell Uinive,r- 



sity, 1911-1912, p. 79. 

 VIII. Williams, W. L., The Granular Venereal Disease and Abor- 

 tion in Cattle. Bulletin of the U. S. Dept. Agr., No. 106, 

 Sept. 12, 1914, p. 49. 



IX. Williams, W. L., Abortion and Sterility in Cattle. Rep. N. Y. 



State Vet. Col. at Cornell University, 1913-1914, p. 136. 



X. Williams, W. L., Abortion and Sterility in Cattle. Rep. N. Y. 



State Vet. Col. at Cornell University, 1911-1912, p. 85, 

 Herd A. 



XI. Williams, W. L., Abortion and Sterility in Cattle. Rep. N. Y. 



State Vet. Col. at Cornell University, 1911-1912, p. 87, 

 Herd B. 

 XII. Williams, W. L., Abortion and Sterility in Cattle. Rep. N. Y. 

 State Vet. Col. at Cornell University, 1911-1912, p. 87, 

 Herd C. 

 As early as 1912 (VII), I made the following statement: 

 "It has not been clearly shown that a like number and kind 

 of pregnant cattle would not have aborted had sterile salt 

 solution been substituted for the Bang organism." 



A critical study of the tabulated data bears out this asser- 

 tion : 



