THE SOURCES OF THE NITROGEN OF VEGETATION, ETC. 467 
H.—M. A. PerzHoLpt on THE SouRCE OF THE NITROGEN OF PLANTS*. 
In the years 1852 and 1853, M. H. M. CuteBpoparow made some experiments on the 
subject of the assimilation of Nitrogen by plants, at Dorpat, under the direction of 
M. PetzHoupt, who has reported the results of the inquiry. 
M. Perznotpt assumes that if plants can appropriate the free Nitrogen of the air, 
they will not need ammonia; and that if they take Nitrogen from ammonia, the arti- 
ficial supply of the latter will increase growth. 
The experiments were made upon Barley. In 1852, an ignited yellow sand was taken 
as the soil. To one set of plants, no ammonia was supplied; to a second, carbonate of 
ammonia was provided in the soil; and to a third, carbonate of ammonia was supplied 
in the air. Both the crops with an artificial supply of ammonia gave three times as 
much produce as the crops without such supply. The Nitrogen in the produce was 
also very much greater, both in percentage, and in actual amount, where the ammonia 
was used. 
In 1853, six sets of experiments were made, and as before, with Barley. The soils con- 
sisted of an artificial mixture of clay, sand, and felspar, decomposed by heating with 
lime. The first set of three pots was provided with this soil alone; the second had, 
in addition, 0°13 per cent. of bone-ash acted upon by sulphuric acid; and the third had 
1:33 per cent., or ten times as much, of the same phosphatic manure. The three other 
sets were, respectively, so far like the three just described, but in addition ammonia 
-was artificially supplied to the atmosphere in which the plants grew. The phosphatic 
manure, whether with or without the ammoniacal supply, much increased the produce 
of both corn and straw. The Nitrogen of the crops was also very much increased in 
actual amount (though diminished in percentage in the dry substance) by the aid of 
the phosphatic manure; and the actual amount of Nitrogen was still further increased 
by the addition of ammonia to the atmosphere of the plants; and the percentage of 
Nitrogen in the dry substance was also greater where the ammonia was supplied, than 
in the corresponding cases without it. The experiments without ammonia were made 
in free air. The Nitrogen in the produce was about seven times that of the seeds where 
no phosphates were employed; about twelve times that of the seed witn the smaller 
quantity of phosphate ; and about twenty times that of the seed with the larger amount 
of phosphate. 
M. PrrzHoupr considered it difficult to account for the fact of M. Boussineavur get- 
ting little or no increase of Nitrogen when he grew plants’ in free air, which must have 
supplied some ammonia, even though rain and dew were excluded. He thinks the error 
must be on the side of M. Boussinaautr. 
It is seen that the explanations or conclusions of these several arbitrators are nearly 
as conflicting as those of M. Boussineautt and M. G. ViuLE themselves. 
For ourselves we are free to confess that we are unable to discover, either in the 
* Journ. fir Prakt. Chem. Band lxv. 
