ESTI^IATIOX OF (,)lTALITy 255 



REPORT OF BACTERIOLOGIST. 



Philadelphia, 190 .. . 



Secretary of the Comniisxioji^ 

 Dear Sir: 



At the request of the Commission, received on 



mUk 



, 190 .. , cream from the dairy of 



labeled was obtained by me on 



190 .. , at Street, at o'clock, 



.... M., and examined at o'clock, .... M., with the following resvilts — 



milk 



Number of bacteria per c.c. of cream 



I have been unable to detect any pathogenic organisms or evidence 

 of purulent inflammation of the udder. 



mUk 

 I therefore recommend the crcum as coming up to the bacteriologic 

 standards adopted by the Coiami.ssion. 



I find the bottles to be sealed in the manner prescribed by tlie 

 Commission. 



Y(j\irs truly, 

 liarlcri/ildijixt. 



REPORT OF CHEMIST. 



Philadelphia, 190. . . 



Secretary nj Ihr Coiiiiiiiaxiiiii^ 

 Dear Sir: 



At tlic request of the Commission, received on 



milk 



lilO . , cream from the dairy of 



labeled was olilained by me on 



190. , and examined with the following results: 



Fat, (Leffman-Beam method,) 



Total proteids, (Kjeldahl-(!unning method, factor (i.L!.")). 



Preservatives, added color and heat, none. 



.\cidity, 



iSpecilic gravity, 



milk 

 I therefore recommend the cream a.s coming up to the chemical 

 standards adoptcil l>y tlie Commission. 



I find the bottles to be sealed in the manner prescribed by the Com- 

 mission. 



Yours truly, 



Chemist. 



